The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Promoting excellence in teaching and learning in clinical education
Open accessAbstract
Clinical learning is the essence of medical education. Many factors have been demonstrated to influence students' development of clinical competence. These factors include students' exposure to a large volume and variety of clinical experiences, learning in authentic clinical settings, self-directed learning, and the provision of a supportive environment. Clinical teachers have an extremely important role in the effectiveness of clinical education in supporting learners, encouraging reflection, and providing constructive and regular feedback. Early and frequent clinical experiences should be planned and integrated in curricula. The provision of such opportunities is associated with the development of appropriate attitudes and the acquisition of commendation and diagnostic skills among undergraduate medical students. The experiences of undergraduate medical students at clinical venues should be documented to enable monitoring of the quality of their exposure and planning for appropriate interventions. The combination of teaching in family practice centers and hospitals will probably provide the most effective approach and will combine the recognized advantages from different sites. The recent challenges facing the health care system necessitate the need for innovative teaching strategies, such as simulation, to meet the inadequacy of clinical cases at the teaching sites. The quality of clinical teaching should be maintained through regular evaluations of clinical teachers and all teaching activities. This article addresses the possible factors that could affect the process of student learning and suggests measures to promote the quality of clinical teaching and learning.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The source backs part of the claim, not all of it — or backs it for a different population, condition or comparison.
In the citing paper
“However, the standard case-based learning approach often faces a significant shortage of materials featuring authentic clinical cases5,6.”
From A large language model digital patient system enhances ophthalmology history taking skills (2025) · cites this paper as [6]
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Barry Issenberg, S., Mcgaghie, W. C., Petrusa, E. R., Lee Gordon, D., & Scalese, R. J. (2005) · Medical Teacher · doi:10.1080/01421590500046924 · Cited by 3,966
Research works printed but not linked: 31
- Littlewood, 2005, Early practical experience and the social responsiveness of clinical education: systematic review, BMJ, 331, 387, 10.1136/bmj.331.7513.387 · DOI
- Howe, 2007, Patient contact in the first year of basic medical training-feasible, educational, acceptable?, Med Teach, 29, 237, 10.1080/01421590701294356 · DOI
- O'Sullivan, 2000, Students' perceptions of the relative advantages and disadvantages of community-based and hospital-based teaching: a qualitative study, Med Educ, 34, 648, 10.1046/j.1365-2923.2000.00623.x · DOI
- Carney, 2002, An analysis of students' clinical experiences in an integrated primary care clerkship, Acad Med, 77, 681, 10.1097/00001888-200207000-00007 · DOI
- Murray, 1999, A comparison of educational opportunities on junior medical attachments in general practice and in teaching hospital: a questionnaire survey, Med Educ, 33, 170, 10.1046/j.1365-2923.1999.00344.x · DOI
- Bryant, 2003, Clinical exposure during clinical method attachments in general practice, Med Educ, 37, 790, 10.1046/j.1365-2923.2003.01597.x · DOI
- Parle, 1997, Acquisition of basic clinical skills in the general practice setting, Med Educ, 31, 99, 10.1111/j.1365-2923.1997.tb02466.x · DOI
- Rattner, 2001, Documentation and comparing medical students' clinical experiences, JAMA, 286, 1035, 10.1001/jama.286.9.1035 · DOI
- Pipas, 2002, Development of handheld computer documentation system to enhance an integrated primary care clerkship, Acad Med, 77, 600, 10.1097/00001888-200207000-00004 · DOI
- AlHaqwi, 2010, Achieving clinical competence, Saudi Med J, 31, 2
- AlHaqwi, 2010, Determinants of effective clinical learning: a students and teacher perspectives in Saudi Arabia, Educ Health, 23, 1, 10.4103/1357-6283.101490 · DOI
- Wimmers, 2006, Influence of clerkship experiences on clinical competence, Med Educ, 40, 450, 10.1111/j.1365-2929.2006.02447.x · DOI
- Rolf, 2002, Translating learning principles into practice: a new strategy for learning clinical skills, Med Educ, 36, 345, 10.1046/j.1365-2923.2002.01170.x · DOI
- Kneebone, 2002, An innovative model for teaching and learning clinical procedures, Med Educ, 36, 628634, 10.1046/j.1365-2923.2002.01261.x · DOI
- Lofmark, 2001, Facilitating and obstructing factors for development of learning in clinical practice; a student perspective, J Adv Nurs, 34, 43, 10.1046/j.1365-2648.2001.3411739.x · DOI
- Chatenany, 1996, Does volume of clinical experience affect performance of clinical clerks on surgery exit examinations?, Am J Surg, 172, 366, 10.1016/S0002-9610(96)00184-5 · DOI
- Dolmans, 2002, The impact of supervision, patient mix, and numbers of students on the effectiveness of clinical rotations, Acad Med, 77, 332, 10.1097/00001888-200204000-00016 · DOI
- Kliminster, 2007, Effective educational and clinical supervision, Med Teach, 29, 2, 10.1080/01421590701210907 · DOI
- AlHaqwi, 2014, Development of the clinical learning evaluation questionnaire for undergraduate clinical education: factor structure, validity, and reliability study, BMC Med Educ, 14, 44, 10.1186/1472-6920-14-44 · DOI
- Weller, 2012, Simulation in clinical teaching and learning, MJA, 196, 1
- Norris, 2009, Longitudinal integrated clerkships for medical students: an innovation adopted by medical schools in Australia, Canada, South Africa, and the United States, Acad Med, 84, 902, 10.1097/ACM.0b013e3181a85776 · DOI
- Heddle, 2014, Challenges in transforming of the “traditional block rotation” medical student clinical education into a longitudinal integrated clerkship model, Educ Health, 27, 138, 10.4103/1357-6283.143744 · DOI
- Buchel, 2005, Characteristics of effective clinical teachers, Fam Med, 37, 30
- Spencer, 2003, Learning and teaching in the clinical environment, BMJ, 326
- AlHaqwi, 2012, Importance and process of feedback in undergraduate medical education in Saudi Arabia, Saudi J Kidney Dis Transpl, 23, 1051, 10.4103/1319-2442.100949 · DOI
- AlHaqwi, 2012, Barriers to feedback in undergraduate medical education, Saudi Med J, 33
- Snell, 2000, A review of the evaluation of clinical teaching: new perspectives and challenges, Med Educ, 34, 862, 10.1046/j.1365-2923.2000.00754.x · DOI
- Berk, 2013, Top five flashpoints in the assessment of teaching effectiveness, Med Educ, 35, 15
- Roff, 2005, The Dundee Ready Educational Environment Measure (DREEM)- a generic instrument for measuring students' perception of undergraduate health profession curricula, Med Teach, 27, 322, 10.1080/01421590500151054 · DOI
- Chan, 2003, Validation of clinical learning inventory, West J Nurs Res, 25, 519, 10.1177/0193945903253161 · DOI
- Copeland, 2000, Developing and testing an instrument to measure the effectiveness of clinical teaching in an academic medical center, Acad Med, 75, 161, 10.1097/00001888-200002000-00015 · DOI
Cited by
Sorted by citations
A large language model digital patient system enhances ophthalmology history taking skills
Luo, M.-J., Bi, S., Pang, J., Liu, L., Tsui, C.-K., Lai, Y., Chen, W., Yang, Y., Xu, K., Zhao, L., et al. (2025) · npj Digital Medicine · doi:10.1038/s41746-025-01841-6 · Cited by 39
Metadata
- Authors
- AlHaqwi, A. I., & Taha, W. S.
- Affiliations
- King Saud bin Abdulaziz University for Health Sciences (SA)
- Corresponding author
- AlHaqwi, Ali I.
- Venue
- Journal of Taibah University Medical Sciences
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2015-03
- Volume
- 10
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 97-101
- ISSN
- 1658-3612 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2055893646
- Cited by
- 67
- References
- 1
- Citations by year
- 2026: 2 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 10 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 10 · 2021: 12 · 2020: 10 · 2019: 6 · 2018: 3
- FWCI
- 0.98
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- Journal of Taibah University Medical Sciences (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
- Funders
- King Saud University
- King Abdulaziz University
- King Saud bin Abdulaziz University for Health Science
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Education › Innovations in Medical Education
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Family Practice › Clinical Reasoning and Diagnostic Skills
- Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Health and Medical Education
- Keywords
- clinical teaching, clinical competence, undergraduate medical students, clinical teaching quality, feedback, self-directed learning, early clinical exposure, simulation-based teaching, teacher evaluation, curriculum integration, reflective learning
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
