Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 198

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 44 of the 44 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Land use regulations and the value of land and housing: An intra-metropolitan analysis

Kok, Nils, Monkkonen, Paavo, Quigley, John M.·2014·Journal of Urban Economics
DOI 10.1016/j.jue.2014.03.004
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.jue.2014.03.004

Cites

44 of 44 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 44 references

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. Glaeser, 2003, The impact of building restrictions on housing affordability, Federal Reserve Bank of New York Economic Policy Review, 9, 21
  2. Glickfeld, M., Levine, N., 1992. Regional Growth, Local Reaction: The Enactment and Effects of Local Growth Control and Management Measures in California, Cambridge, MA.

Cited by

Metadata

Authors
Kok, N., Monkkonen, P., & Quigley, J. M.
Venue
Journal of Urban Economics
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2014-05
Volume
81
Pages
136-148
ISSN
0094-1190
DOI
10.1016/j.jue.2014.03.004
Cited by
198
References
44
Language
en
Licence

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.