The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Effects of Acute Treatment With Tamsulosin Versus Alfuzosin on Ejaculatory Function in Normal Volunteers
Abstract
PURPOSE: The frequency of ejaculatory dysfunction in men varies among the alpha-blockers used in the treatment of lower urinary tract symptoms associated with benign prostatic hyperplasia. We assessed the effect of acute administration of tamsulosin, alfuzosin and placebo on ejaculate volume and sperm concentration in post-ejaculate urine, and addressed the mechanism of action of tamsulosin and alfuzosin on ejaculation. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Using a randomized, 3-way crossover design, the effects of 5 days of treatment with 0.8 mg tamsulosin daily, 10 mg alfuzosin daily and placebo on ejaculation in healthy adult men were compared. The primary end points of the study were ejaculate volume and sperm concentration in post-ejaculate urine on each treatment. To aid in clinical interpretation of primary efficacy end points, each primary end point was transformed into a binary outcome, that is subjects with a greater than 20% decrease in ejaculate volume and subjects with a greater than 20% increase in sperm concentration in post-ejaculate urine. RESULTS: In healthy volunteers who completed the study (48), tamsulosin resulted in significantly decreased ejaculate volume (-2.4 +/- 0.17 ml) compared to alfuzosin (+0.3 +/- 0.18 ml, p < 0.0001 vs tamsulosin) or placebo (+0.4 +/- 0.18 ml, p < 0.0001 vs tamsulosin, p = nonsignificant vs alfuzosin). Among completers the incidence of more than 20% decreased ejaculate volume was significantly greater with tamsulosin (89.6%) compared to alfuzosin (20.8%, p < 0.0001 vs tamsulosin) or placebo (12.5%, p < 0.0001 vs tamsulosin, p = nonsignificant vs alfuzosin). While on tamsulosin 35.4% of 48 completers had complete lack of ejaculation (anejaculation) and no subjects experienced anejaculation while on alfuzosin or placebo. CONCLUSIONS: On 0.8 mg tamsulosin daily ejaculatory function in subjects was marked by decreased ejaculate volume in almost 90% of subjects and anejaculation in approximately 35% of participants. These ejaculatory disorders with tamsulosin were not attributed to retrograde ejaculation. In contrast, anejaculation was not observed in any subjects in the alfuzosin or placebo groups.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Roehrborn, C. G., Siami, P., Barkin, J., Damião, R., Major-Walker, K., Morrill, B., Montorsi, F., & CombAT Study Group (2008) · Journal of Urology · doi:10.1016/j.juro.2007.09.084 · Cited by 356
Gacci, M., Eardley, I., Giuliano, F., Hatzichristou, D., Kaplan, S. A., Maggi, M., McVary, K. T., Mirone, V., Porst, H., & Roehrborn, C. G. (2011) · European Urology · doi:10.1016/j.eururo.2011.06.037 · Cited by 279
Kasman, A. M., Del Giudice, F., & Eisenberg, M. L. (2020) · Fertility and Sterility · doi:10.1016/j.fertnstert.2020.01.002 · Cited by 94
Metadata
- Authors
- Hellstrom, W. J. G., & Sikka, S. C.
- Venue
- Journal of Urology
- Published
- 2006-10
- Volume
- 176
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 1529-1533
- ISSN
- 0022-5347 (ISSN-L)
- 1527-3792
- OpenAlex
- W2045993996
- Cited by
- 205
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 14.08
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Effects of Acute Treatment With Tamsulosin Versus Alfuzosin on Ejaculatory Function in Normal Volunteers. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.juro.2006.06.004
- The paper
- Hellstrom, W. J. G., & Sikka, S. C. (2006). Effects of Acute Treatment With Tamsulosin Versus Alfuzosin on Ejaculatory Function in Normal Volunteers. Journal of Urology. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.juro.2006.06.004
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.