The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Incidence of Post-Pyelonephritic Renal Scarring: A Meta-Analysis of the Dimercapto-Succinic Acid Literature
Abstract
PURPOSE: We investigated ethnic differences in the risk of post-pyelonephritic renal scarring in infants and children for possible genetic determinants. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We searched all peer reviewed articles published from 1980 through 2006 in the PubMed(R), MEDLINE(R) (Ovid), Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials and EMBASE(R) databases for the keywords, "renal scarring and pyelonephritis," "renal fibrosis" and "kidney scarring." References were included only when they specified acute pyelonephritis defined by a fever, positive urine culture and areas of photopenia in the renal cortex on 99mtechnetium dimercapto-succinic acid renal scans, repeat dimercapto-succinic acid scans obtained at least 3 months after acute pyelonephritis to assess for renal cortical scar formation and absence of recurrent urinary tract infection during followup. When possible data were analyzed according to patients and renal units. RESULTS: Among 23 references the overall rates of renal scarring in terms of patients and renal units were 41.6% and 37.0%, respectively. In terms of patients the incidence of renal scarring following acute pyelonephritis varied by region, from 26.5% (Australia) to 49.0% (Asia). In terms of renal units the incidence of acquired renal cortical scarring varied by region, from 16.7% (Middle East) to 58.4% (Asia). When combined by vesicoureteral reflux status children and renal units with refluxing ureters exhibited an increased risk of renal scarring (odds ratios 2.8 and 3.7, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: Although scarring was different across some regions, only scarring in Asian studies comparing patients displayed a statistically significant difference. A regional effect explained the heterogeneity observed in the overall estimate for patients and partly for renal units. The greatest risk of renal scarring may be imparted by the presence of vesicoureteral reflux.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Funnel plots for detecting bias in meta-analysis
Sterne, J. A. C., & Egger, M. (2001) · Journal of Clinical Epidemiology · doi:10.1016/s0895-4356(01)00377-8 · Cited by 3,779
Parametric empirical Bayes inference: theory and applications
Morris, C. N. (1983) · Journal of the American Statistical Association · doi:10.1080/01621459.1983.10477920 · Cited by 1,448
Cited by
Risk of Renal Scarring in Children With a First Urinary Tract Infection: A Systematic Review
Shaikh, N., Ewing, A. L., Bhatnagar, S., & Hoberman, A. (2010) · Pediatrics · doi:10.1542/peds.2010-0685 · Cited by 431
Braga, L. H., Pemberton, J., DeMaria, J., & Lorenzo, A. J. (2011) · Journal of Urology · doi:10.1016/j.juro.2011.03.044 · Cited by 50
Metadata
- Authors
- Faust, W. C., Diaz, M., & Pohl, H. G.
- Venue
- Journal of Urology
- Published
- 2009-01
- Volume
- 181
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 290-298
- ISSN
- 0022-5347 (ISSN-L)
- 1527-3792
- OpenAlex
- W1980397922
- Cited by
- 158
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 1.31
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Incidence of Post-Pyelonephritic Renal Scarring: A Meta-Analysis of the Dimercapto-Succinic Acid Literature. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.juro.2008.09.039
- The paper
- Faust, W. C., Diaz, M., & Pohl, H. G. (2009). Incidence of Post-Pyelonephritic Renal Scarring: A Meta-Analysis of the Dimercapto-Succinic Acid Literature. Journal of Urology. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.juro.2008.09.039
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.