Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 222

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Long-Term Durability of Percutaneous Tibial Nerve Stimulation for the Treatment of Overactive Bladder

MacDiarmid, Scott A., Peters, Kenneth M., Shobeiri, S. Abbas, Wooldridge, Leslie S., Rovner, Eric S., Leong, Fah Che, Siegel, Steven W., Tate, Susan B., Feagins, Brian A.·2010·Journal of Urology

Abstract

PURPOSE: The Overactive Bladder Innovative Therapy Trial during phase 1 was a randomized trial demonstrating comparable effectiveness of percutaneous tibial nerve stimulation and extended-release tolterodine during 12 weeks of therapy for frequency, nocturia, urgency, voided volume and urge incontinence episodes. In this second phase of the Overactive Bladder Innovative Therapy Trial we assessed the sustained therapeutic efficacy of percutaneous tibial nerve stimulation in subjects with overactive bladder during 1 year. MATERIALS AND METHODS: After 12 weeks subjects randomized to weekly percutaneous tibial nerve stimulation with Urgent((R)) PC were offered an additional 9 months of treatment with assessments at 6 and 12 months from baseline. Outcome measures included voiding diary data, overactive bladder questionnaires, global response assessments and safety assessments. RESULTS: A total of 33 percutaneous tibial nerve stimulation responders continued therapy with 32 and 25 subjects completing 6 and 12 months of therapy, respectively. Subjects received a mean of 12.1 treatments during an average of 263 days, with a mean of 21 days (median 17) between treatments. Subject global response assessments showed sustained improvement from 12 weeks at 6 and 12 months, with 94% and 96% of responders, respectively. At 12 months mean improvements from baseline included a frequency of 2.8 voids daily (p <0.001), urge incontinence of 1.6 episodes daily (p <0.001), nocturia with 0.8 voids (p <0.05) and a voided volume of 39 cc (p <0.05). Overactive bladder questionnaire symptom severity was significantly improved from 12 weeks to 12 months (p <0.01) as well as from 6 to 12 months (p <0.01). No serious adverse events occurred. CONCLUSIONS: Statistically significant overactive bladder symptom improvement achieved with 12 weekly percutaneous tibial nerve stimulation treatments demonstrates excellent durability through 12 months. The durability of response demonstrates the effectiveness of percutaneous tibial nerve stimulation as a viable, long-term therapy for overactive bladder.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.juro.2009.08.160

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 222

Metadata

Authors
MacDiarmid, S. A., Peters, K. M., Shobeiri, S. A., Wooldridge, L. S., Rovner, E. S., Leong, F. C., Siegel, S. W., Tate, S. B., & Feagins, B. A.
Venue
Journal of Urology
Published
2010-01
Volume
183
Issue
1
Pages
234-240
ISSN
  • 0022-5347 (ISSN-L)
  • 1527-3792
OpenAlex
W1993252258
Cited by
222
References
0
FWCI
19.75
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Long-Term Durability of Percutaneous Tibial Nerve Stimulation for the Treatment of Overactive Bladder. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.juro.2009.08.160
The paper
MacDiarmid, S. A., Peters, K. M., Shobeiri, S. A., Wooldridge, L. S., Rovner, E. S., Leong, F. C., Siegel, S. W., Tate, S. B., & Feagins, B. A. (2010). Long-Term Durability of Percutaneous Tibial Nerve Stimulation for the Treatment of Overactive Bladder. Journal of Urology. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.juro.2009.08.160

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.