Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 353

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 16 of the 16 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Phase 3 Efficacy and Tolerability Study of OnabotulinumtoxinA for Urinary Incontinence From Neurogenic Detrusor Overactivity

Ginsberg, David, Gousse, Angelo, Keppenne, Veronique, Sievert, Karl-Dietrich, Thompson, Catherine, Lam, Wayne, Brin, Mitchell F., Jenkins, Brenda, Haag-Molkenteller, Cornelia·2012·Journal of Urology

Abstract

PURPOSE: We assessed the efficacy, safety and effects on quality of life of onabotulinumtoxinA in patients with neurogenic detrusor overactivity. MATERIALS AND METHODS: In this 52-week, international, multicenter, double-blind, randomized, placebo controlled trial 416 patients with neurogenic detrusor overactivity and urinary incontinence (14 or more episodes per week) resulting from multiple sclerosis (227) and spinal cord injury (189) were treated with intradetrusor injections of onabotulinumtoxinA (200 or 300 U) or placebo. The primary end point was the change from baseline in the mean number of urinary incontinence episodes per week at week 6. Maximum cystometric capacity, maximum detrusor pressure during the first involuntary detrusor contraction and Incontinence Quality of Life total score were secondary end points. Adverse events were monitored. RESULTS: OnabotulinumtoxinA at a dose of 200 U in 135 patients and 300 U in 132 decreased mean urinary incontinence at week 6 by 21 and 23 episodes per week, respectively, vs 9 episodes per week in 149 on placebo (each dose p<0.001). Also, maximum cystometric capacity, maximum detrusor pressure during the first involuntary detrusor contraction and Incontinence Quality of Life score were significantly improved over values in the placebo group (each dose p<0.001). Median time to patient re-treatment request was greater for onabotulinumtoxinA 200 and 300 U than for placebo (256 and 254 days, respectively, vs 92). The most common adverse events were urinary tract infection and urinary retention. Of patients who did not catheterize at baseline 10% on placebo, 35% on 200 U and 42% on 300 U initiated catheterization due to urinary retention. CONCLUSIONS: OnabotulinumtoxinA significantly improved neurogenic detrusor overactivity symptoms vs placebo. Clean intermittent catheterization initiation due to urinary retention appeared to increase in a dose dependent fashion. No clinically relevant benefit in efficacy or duration was identified for the 300 U dose over the 200 U dose.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.juro.2012.01.125

Cites

16 of 16 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 16 references

Cited by

See all 353

Metadata

Authors
Ginsberg, D., Gousse, A., Keppenne, V., Sievert, K.-D., Thompson, C., Lam, W., Brin, M. F., Jenkins, B., & Haag-Molkenteller, C.
Venue
Journal of Urology
Published
2012-06
Volume
187
Issue
6
Pages
2131-2139
ISSN
  • 0022-5347 (ISSN-L)
  • 1527-3792
OpenAlex
W2081071477
Cited by
353
References
16
FWCI
38.00
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Phase 3 Efficacy and Tolerability Study of OnabotulinumtoxinA for Urinary Incontinence From Neurogenic Detrusor Overactivity. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.juro.2012.01.125
The paper
Ginsberg, D., Gousse, A., Keppenne, V., Sievert, K.-D., Thompson, C., Lam, W., Brin, M. F., Jenkins, B., & Haag-Molkenteller, C. (2012). Phase 3 Efficacy and Tolerability Study of OnabotulinumtoxinA for Urinary Incontinence From Neurogenic Detrusor Overactivity. Journal of Urology. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.juro.2012.01.125

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.