The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Diagnosis, Evaluation and Follow-Up of Asymptomatic Microhematuria (AMH) in Adults: AUA Guideline
Abstract
PURPOSE: The purpose of this guideline is to provide a clinical framework for the diagnosis, evaluation and follow-up of asymptomatic microhematuria. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A systematic literature review using the MEDLINE® database was conducted to identify peer reviewed publications relevant to the definition, diagnosis, evaluation and follow-up for AMH. The review yielded 191 evidence-based articles, and these publications were used to create the majority of the guideline statements. There was insufficient evidence-based data for certain concepts; therefore, clinical principles and consensus expert opinions were used for portions of the guideline statements. RESULTS: Guideline statements are provided for diagnosis, evaluation and follow-up. The panel identified multiphasic computed tomography as the preferred imaging technique and developed guideline statements for persistent or recurrent AMH as well as follow-up. CONCLUSIONS: AMH is only diagnosed by microscopy; a dipstick reading suggestive of hematuria should not lead to imaging or further investigation without confirmation of three or greater red blood cells per high power field. The evaluation and follow-up algorithm and guidelines provide a systematic approach to the patient with AMH. All patients 35 years or older should undergo cystoscopy, and upper urinary tract imaging is indicated in all adults with AMH in the absence of known benign causation. The imaging modalities and physical evaluation techniques are evolving, and these guidelines will need to be updated as the effectiveness of these become available. Please visit the AUA website at http://www.auanet.org/content/media/asymptomatic_microhematuria_guideline.pdf to view this guideline in its entirety.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Gender and Bladder Cancer: A Collaborative Review of Etiology, Biology, and Outcomes
Dobruch, J., Daneshmand, S., Fisch, M., Lotan, Y., Noon, A. P., Resnick, M. J., Shariat, S. F., Zlotta, A. R., & Boorjian, S. A. (2016) · European Urology · doi:10.1016/j.eururo.2015.08.037 · Cited by 673
Chughtai, B., Forde, J. C., Thomas, D. D. M., Laor, L., Hossack, T., Woo, H. H., Te, A. E., & Kaplan, S. A. (2016) · Nature Reviews Disease Primers · doi:10.1038/nrdp.2016.31 · Cited by 462
Lentine, K. L., Kasiske, B. L., Levey, A. S., Adams, P. L., Alberú, J., Bakr, M. A., Gallon, L., Garvey, C. A., Guleria, S., Li, P. K.-T., et al. (2017) · Transplantation · doi:10.1097/tp.0000000000001770 · Cited by 300
Doggweiler, R., Whitmore, K. E., Meijlink, J. M., Drake, M. J., Frawley, H., Nordling, J., Hanno, P., Fraser, M. O., Homma, Y., Garrido, G., et al. (2017) · Neurourology and Urodynamics · doi:10.1002/nau.23072 · Cited by 230
Metadata
- Authors
- Davis, R., Jones, J. S., Barocas, D. A., Castle, E. P., Lang, E. K., Leveillee, R. J., Messing, E. M., Miller, S. D., Peterson, A. C., Turk, T. M. T., & Weitzel, W.
- Venue
- Journal of Urology
- Published
- 2012-12
- Volume
- 188
- Issue
- 6S
- Pages
- 2473-2481
- ISSN
- 0022-5347 (ISSN-L)
- 1527-3792
- OpenAlex
- W2028583450
- Cited by
- 482
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 21.81
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Diagnosis, Evaluation and Follow-Up of Asymptomatic Microhematuria (AMH) in Adults: AUA Guideline. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.juro.2012.09.078
- The paper
- Davis, R., Jones, J. S., Barocas, D. A., Castle, E. P., Lang, E. K., Leveillee, R. J., Messing, E. M., Miller, S. D., Peterson, A. C., Turk, T. M. T., & Weitzel, W. (2012). Diagnosis, Evaluation and Follow-Up of Asymptomatic Microhematuria (AMH) in Adults: AUA Guideline. Journal of Urology. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.juro.2012.09.078
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.