Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 290

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 17 of the 17 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Urodynamic Studies in Adults: AUA/SUFU Guideline

Winters, J. Christian, Dmochowski, Roger R., Goldman, Howard B., Herndon, C.D. Anthony, Kobashi, Kathleen C., Kraus, Stephen R., Lemack, Gary E., Nitti, Victor W., Rovner, Eric S., Wein, Alan J.·2012·Journal of Urology

Abstract

PURPOSE: The authors of this guideline reviewed the literature regarding use of urodynamic testing in common lower urinary tract symptoms. The findings are intended to assist clinicians in the appropriate selection of urodynamic tests, following an evaluation and symptom characterization. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A systematic review of the literature using the MEDLINE® and EMBASE databases (searched from 1/1/90 to 3/10/11) was conducted to identify peer-reviewed publications relevant to using urodynamic tests for diagnosis, determining prognosis, guiding clinical management decisions and improving patient outcomes in patients with various urologic conditions. The review yielded an evidence base of 393 studies after application of inclusion/exclusion criteria. These publications were used to create the evidence basis for characterizing the statements presented in the guideline as Standards, Recommendations or Options. When sufficient evidence existed, the body of evidence for a particular treatment was assigned a strength rating of A (high), B (moderate) or C (low). In the absence of sufficient evidence, additional information is provided as Clinical Principles and Expert Opinion. RESULTS: The evidence-based guideline statements are provided for diagnosis and overall management of common LUTS conditions. CONCLUSIONS: The Panel recognizes that each patient presenting with LUTS is unique. This Guideline is intended to serve as a tool facilitating the most effective utilization of urodynamic testing as part of a comprehensive evaluation of patients presenting with LUTS.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.juro.2012.09.081

Cites

17 of 17 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 17 references

Metadata

Authors
Winters, J. C., Dmochowski, R. R., Goldman, H. B., Herndon, C. D. A., Kobashi, K. C., Kraus, S. R., Lemack, G. E., Nitti, V. W., Rovner, E. S., & Wein, A. J.
Venue
Journal of Urology
Published
2012-12
Volume
188
Issue
6S
Pages
2464-2472
ISSN
  • 0022-5347 (ISSN-L)
  • 1527-3792
OpenAlex
W2034419123
Cited by
290
References
17
FWCI
25.11
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Urodynamic Studies in Adults: AUA/SUFU Guideline. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.juro.2012.09.081
The paper
Winters, J. C., Dmochowski, R. R., Goldman, H. B., Herndon, C. D. A., Kobashi, K. C., Kraus, S. R., Lemack, G. E., Nitti, V. W., Rovner, E. S., & Wein, A. J. (2012). Urodynamic Studies in Adults: AUA/SUFU Guideline. Journal of Urology. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.juro.2012.09.081

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.