The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Laparoscopic Radical Prostatectomy with a Remote Controlled Robot
Abstract
PURPOSE: Robotics in surgery is a recent innovation. This technology offers a number of attractive features in laparoscopy. It overcomes the difficulties with fixed port sites by restoring all 6 degrees of freedom at the instrument tips, provides new possibilities for miniaturization of surgical tasks and allows remote controlled surgery. We investigated the applicability of remote controlled robotic surgery to laparoscopic radical prostatectomy. MATERIALS AND METHODS: robotic system performed all steps of the intervention. A scrub nurse and second surgeon who stood at patient side had limited roles to port and instrument placement, exposure of the operative field, assistance in hemostasis and removal of the operative specimen. Our patient was a 63-year-old man presenting with a T1c tumor discovered on 1 positive sextant biopsy with a 3+3 Gleason score and 7 ng./ml. preoperative serum prostate specific antigen. RESULTS: The robot provided an ergonomic surgical environment and remarkable dexterity enhancement. Operating time was 420 minutes, and the hospital stay lasted 4 days. The bladder catheter was removed 3 days postoperatively, and 1 week later the patient was fully continent. Pathological examination showed a pT3a tumor with negative margins. CONCLUSIONS: Robotically assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy is feasible. This new technology enhances surgical dexterity. Further developments in this field may have new applications in laparoscopic tele-surgery.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Menon, M., Tewari, A., Baize, B., Guillonneau, B., & Vallancien, G. (2002) · Urology · doi:10.1016/s0090-4295(02)01881-2 · Cited by 455
Evidence from Robot-Assisted Laparoscopic Radical Prostatectomy: A Systematic Review
Ficarra, V., Cavalleri, S., Novara, G., Aragona, M., & Artibani, W. (2007) · European Urology · doi:10.1016/j.eururo.2006.06.017 · Cited by 378
The Evaluation of Telemedicine and Health Services Research
Grigsby, J., Brega, A. G., & Devore, P. A. (2005) · Telemedicine and e-Health · doi:10.1089/tmj.2005.11.317 · Cited by 48
Metadata
- Authors
- Abbou, C.-C., Hoznek, A., Salomon, L., Olsson, L. E., Lobontiu, A., Saint, F., Cicco, A., Antiphon, P., & Chopin, D.
- Venue
- Journal of Urology
- Published
- 2017-02
- Volume
- 197
- Issue
- 2S
- Pages
- S210-S212
- ISSN
- 0022-5347 (ISSN-L)
- 1527-3792
- OpenAlex
- W2134957496
- Cited by
- 335
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 9.00
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Laparoscopic Radical Prostatectomy with a Remote Controlled Robot. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.juro.2016.10.107
- The paper
- Abbou, C.-C., Hoznek, A., Salomon, L., Olsson, L. E., Lobontiu, A., Saint, F., Cicco, A., Antiphon, P., & Chopin, D. (2017). Laparoscopic Radical Prostatectomy with a Remote Controlled Robot. Journal of Urology. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.juro.2016.10.107
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.