Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 261

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Profiling the Urinary Microbiome in Men with Positive versus Negative Biopsies for Prostate Cancer

Open access
Shrestha, Eva, White, James R., Yu, Shu-Han, Kulac, Ibrahim, Ertunc, Onur, De Marzo, Angelo M., Yegnasubramanian, Srinivasan, Mangold, Leslie A., Partin, Alan W., Sfanos, Karen S.·2018·Journal of Urology

Abstract

PURPOSE: Studies demonstrating bacterial DNA and cultivable bacteria in urine samples have challenged the clinical dogma that urine is sterile. Furthermore, studies now indicate that dysbiosis of the urinary microbiome is associated with pathological conditions. We propose that the urinary microbiome may influence chronic inflammation observed in the prostate, leading to prostate cancer development and progression. Therefore, we profiled the urinary microbiome in men with positive vs negative biopsies for prostate cancer. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Urine was collected from men prior to biopsy for prostate cancer. DNA was extracted from urine pellet samples and subjected to bacterial 16S rDNA Illumina® sequencing and 16S rDNA quantitative polymerase chain reaction. We determined the association between bacterial species and the presence or absence of cancer, cancer grade, and type and degree of prostate inflammation. RESULTS: Urine samples revealed diverse bacterial populations. There were no significant differences in α or β diversity and no clear hierarchical clustering of benign or cancer samples. We identified a cluster of pro-inflammatory bacteria previously implicated in urogenital infections in a subset of samples. Many species, including known uropathogens, were significantly and differentially abundant among cancer and benign samples, in low vs higher grade cancers and in relation to prostate inflammation type and degree. CONCLUSIONS: To our knowledge we report the most comprehensive study to date of the male urinary microbiome and its relationship to prostate cancer. Our results suggest a prevalence of pro-inflammatory bacteria and uropathogens in the urinary tract of men with prostate cancer.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.juro.2017.08.001

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 1 references

Cited by

See all 261

Metadata

Authors
Shrestha, E., White, J. R., Yu, S.-H., Kulac, I., Ertunc, O., De Marzo, A. M., Yegnasubramanian, S., Mangold, L. A., Partin, A. W., & Sfanos, K. S.
Venue
Journal of Urology
Published
2018-01
Volume
199
Issue
1
Pages
161-171
ISSN
  • 0022-5347 (ISSN-L)
  • 1527-3792
OpenAlex
W2744158343
Cited by
261
References
1
FWCI
13.73
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
green

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Profiling the Urinary Microbiome in Men with Positive versus Negative Biopsies for Prostate Cancer. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.juro.2017.08.001
The paper
Shrestha, E., White, J. R., Yu, S.-H., Kulac, I., Ertunc, O., De Marzo, A. M., Yegnasubramanian, S., Mangold, L. A., Partin, A. W., & Sfanos, K. S. (2018). Profiling the Urinary Microbiome in Men with Positive versus Negative Biopsies for Prostate Cancer. Journal of Urology. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.juro.2017.08.001

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.