CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 949Sexual function and dysfunction studiesUrological Disorders and TreatmentsUrinary Bladder and Prostate Research

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 52 of the 53 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Erectile Dysfunction: AUA Guideline

Burnett, Arthur L., Nehra, Ajay, Breau, Rodney H., Culkin, Daniel J., Faraday, Martha M., Hakim, Lawrence S., Heidelbaugh, Joel, Khera, Mohit, McVary, Kevin T., Miner, Martin M., Nelson, Christian J., Sadeghi-Nejad, Hossein, Seftel, Allen D., Shindel, Alan W.·2018·Journal of Urology
DOI 10.1016/j.juro.2018.05.004
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

PURPOSE: The purpose of this guideline is to provide a clinical strategy for the diagnosis and treatment of erectile dysfunction. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A systematic review of the literature using the Pubmed, Embase, and Cochrane databases (search dates 1/1/1965 to 7/29/17) was conducted to identify peer-reviewed publications relevant to the diagnosis and treatment of erectile dysfunction. Evidence-based statements were based on body of evidence strength Grade A, B, or C and were designated as Strong, Moderate, and Conditional Recommendations with additional statements presented in the form of Clinical Principles or Expert Opinions. RESULTS: The American Urological Association has developed an evidence-based guideline on the management of erectile dysfunction. This document is designed to be used in conjunction with the associated treatment algorithm. CONCLUSIONS: Using the shared decision-making process as a cornerstone for care, all patients should be informed of all treatment modalities that are not contraindicated, regardless of invasiveness or irreversibility, as potential first-line treatments. For each treatment, the clinician should ensure that the man and his partner have a full understanding of the benefits and risk/burdens associated with that choice.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.juro.2018.05.004

Cites

52 of 52 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Show all 53 references

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. 1992, Impotence, NIH Consensus Statement, 10, 1

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Items 901–944 of 944

Related

See all

Metadata

Authors
Burnett, A. L., Nehra, A., Breau, R. H., Culkin, D. J., Faraday, M. M., Hakim, L. S., Heidelbaugh, J., Khera, M., McVary, K. T., Miner, M. M., Nelson, C. J., Sadeghi-Nejad, H., Seftel, A. D., & Shindel, A. W.
Affiliations
  • American Urological Association (US)
  • American Urological Association Education and Research, Inc., Linthicum, Maryland
ORCID
Venue
Journal of Urology
Publisher
Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health)
Published
2018-09
Volume
200
Issue
3
Pages
633-641
ISSN
  • 0022-5347 (ISSN-L)
  • 1527-3792
DOI
10.1016/j.juro.2018.05.004
OpenAlex
W2801324609
Cited by
949
References
53
Citations by year
2026: 162 · 2025: 127 · 2024: 144 · 2023: 140 · 2022: 100 · 2021: 108 · 2020: 86 · 2019: 70 · 2018: 8
FWCI
53.14
Type
journal article
Language
en
Update notices
erratum (2022-03-01)
Open access
closed
Licence
www.elsevier.com/tdm/userlicense/1.0/ (tdm)
Locations
  • The Journal of Urology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • eScholarship (California Digital Library) (acceptedVersion)
  • eScholarship (California Digital Library) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Sexual function and dysfunction studies
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Urology › Urological Disorders and Treatments
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Urology › Urinary Bladder and Prostate Research
Keywords
erectile dysfunction, diagnosis, treatment, shared decision-making, first-line therapy, treatment algorithm, patient education, evidence-based recommendations
MeSH terms
Clinical Decision-Making, Decision Making, Humans, Erectile Dysfunction, Male, Patient Participation, Societies, Medical, Urology, Critical Pathways

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review