The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Risk of dementia associated with the use of paroxetine among the elderly nursing home patients with depression
Open accessOverview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
This utilization pattern is consistent with previous studies.
“This utilization pattern is consistent with the findings from previous studies (23)(24)(25).”
From Risk of Dementia Among Elderly Nursing Home Patients Using Paroxetine and Other Selective Serotonin Reuptake Inhibitors (2015) · cites this paper as [25]
The Results (p. A209) report a utilization distribution: 9.01% of SSRI users received paroxetine and 90.99% received other SSRIs. The cited sentence does not specify what “this utilization pattern” is, so the source supports a prior pattern of SSRI use but does not establish that the two patterns are consistent. (LLM, conf=0.72)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredParoxetine is commonly used for the treatment of depression among elderly patients.
“Although paroxetine is highly anticholinergic, it is commonly used for the treatment of depression among elderly patients (23)(24)(25).”
From Risk of Dementia Among Elderly Nursing Home Patients Using Paroxetine and Other Selective Serotonin Reuptake Inhibitors (2015) · cites this paper as [25]
The Results report that 1,716 of 19,050 elderly nursing home residents with depression who used SSRIs received paroxetine, supporting its use for depression in that population. The Objectives also describe its strong anticholinergic properties. The study does not establish how commonly paroxetine is used among elderly patients generally, beyond the nursing home cohort. (LLM, conf=0.84)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Bali, V., Chatterjee, S., Carnahan, R. M., Chen, H., Johnson, M. L., & Aparasu, R. R. (2015) · Psychiatric Services · doi:10.1176/appi.ps.201500011 · Cited by 23
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Bali, V., Aparasu, R. R., Johnson, M. L., Chen, H., & Carnahan, R. M.
- Affiliations
- University of Houston (US)
- University of Iowa (US)
- Venue
- Value in Health
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2014-05
- Volume
- 17
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- A209
- ISSN
- 1098-3015 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2092050319
- Cited by
- 4
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2017: 1 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 1
- FWCI
- 1.03
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- Value in Health (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Geriatrics and Gerontology › Pharmaceutical Practices and Patient Outcomes
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Pharmacology (medical) › Treatment of Major Depression
- Keywords
- paroxetine, dementia risk, nursing home residents, depression, selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors, anticholinergic effects, Beers criteria, elderly patients, adverse drug reactions, cognitive outcomes
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
