Cited by 10Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of LifeHER2/EGFR in Cancer ResearchEconomic and Financial Impacts of Cancer

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Cost-Minimization Analysis of Trastuzumab Intravenous Versus Trastuzumab Subcutaneous for the Treatment of Patients With HER2+ Early Breast Cancer And Metastatic Breast Cancer in Greece

Open access

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.jval.2014.08.2310

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Mylonas, C., Kourlaba, G., Fountzilas, G., Skroumpelos, A., & Maniadakis, N.
Affiliations
  • National School of Public Health (GR)
  • Aristotle University of Thessaloniki (GR)
  • Roche (Greece) (GR)
Venue
Value in Health
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2014-11
Volume
17
Issue
7
Pages
A640-A641
ISSN
1098-3015 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2320478156
Cited by
10
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 1 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 1
FWCI
3.31
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Value in Health (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Economics and Econometrics › Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › HER2/EGFR in Cancer Research
  • Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Economics and Econometrics › Economic and Financial Impacts of Cancer
Keywords
trastuzumab, subcutaneous administration, intravenous administration, HER2-positive breast cancer, early breast cancer, metastatic breast cancer, cost-minimization analysis, treatment costs

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review