Cited by 1Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of LifePharmaceutical Economics and PolicyHealthcare Policy and Management

Cost-Effectiveness of the 15 Drugs Selected for Initial Price Applicability Year 2027 by Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services Drug Price Negotiation Program

Xie, Feng, Zhou, Ting, Ma, Yue, Cohen, Joshua T., Neumann, Peter J.·2026·Value in Health

Abstract

Objectives To analyze published cost-effectiveness analyses (CEAs) for the 15 drugs selected for the Initial Price Applicability Year 2027 by the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services. Methods We identified CEAs for the 15 drugs from the Tufts Cost-Effectiveness Analysis Registry. For each drug, we included all base-case incremental cost-effectiveness ratios (ICERs) and calculated median and interquartile ranges for positive ICERs for each drug indication. We also performed the analyses on CEAs conducted in the United States, which used a lifetime horizon, or were industry sponsored. We present all costs in 2022 US dollars. Results A total of 20 drug-indications were included in the analysis. Most studies used a nonsocietal perspective and were industry sponsored. Median positive ICERs ranged from $1800 (linagliptin) to $640 000 (acalabrutinib) with 6 drug indications having a median ICER less than $50 000 and 10 more than $100 000. Among the 13 drug indications with US-based CEAs, 11 had a median ICER near or more than $100 000. Among CEAs with a lifetime horizon, 7 drug indications had a median ICER less than $50 000, and 5 more than $100 000. CEAs sponsored by industry had median ICERs more than $100 000 for 5 drug indications. The median ICERs differed considerably between the 2 covered indications for semaglutide, linaclotide, and rifaximin. Conclusions As Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services continues to implement its drug price negotiation program, promoting…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.jval.2025.08.019

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Xie, F., Zhou, T., Ma, Y., Cohen, J. T., & Neumann, P. J.
Affiliations
  • McMaster University (CA)
  • China Pharmaceutical University (CN)
  • Tufts Medical Center (US)
Corresponding author
Xie, Feng
Venue
Value in Health
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2026-01
Volume
29
Issue
1
Pages
14-18
ISSN
1098-3015 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4414105061
Cited by
1
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 1
FWCI
0.91
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Value in Health (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Economics and Econometrics › Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life
  • Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Economics and Econometrics › Pharmaceutical Economics and Policy
  • Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Economics and Econometrics › Healthcare Policy and Management
Keywords
Medicare Part D, cost-effectiveness analysis, incremental cost-effectiveness ratio, drug pricing, value-based pricing, semaglutide, linaclotide, rifaximin, acalabrutinib, linagliptin
MeSH terms
Cost-Effectiveness Analysis, Pharmaceutical Preparations, United States, Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services, U.S., Drug Costs, Negotiating

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review