Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 583

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 82 of the 82 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Image-Guided Tumor Ablation: Standardization of Terminology and Reporting Criteria—A 10-Year Update

Open access
Ahmed, Muneeb, Solbiati, Luigi, Brace, Christopher L., Breen, David J., Callstrom, Matthew R., Charboneau, J. William, Chen, Min-Hua, Choi, Byung Ihn, de Baère, Thierry, Dodd, Gerald D., Dupuy, Damian E., Gervais, Debra A., Gianfelice, David, Gillams, Alice R., Lee, Fred T., Leen, Edward, Lencioni, Riccardo, Littrup, Peter J., Livraghi, Tito, Lu, David S., McGahan, John P., Meloni, Maria Franca, Nikolic, Boris, Pereira, Philippe L., Liang, Ping, Rhim, Hyunchul, Rose, Steven C., Salem, Riad, Sofocleous, Constantinos T., Solomon, Stephen B., Soulen, Michael C., Tanaka, Masatoshi, Vogl, Thomas J., Wood, Bradford J., Goldberg, S. Nahum·2014·Journal of Vascular and Interventional Radiology

Abstract

Image-guided tumor ablation has become a well-established hallmark of local cancer therapy. The breadth of options available in this growing field increases the need for standardization of terminology and reporting criteria to facilitate effective communication of ideas and appropriate comparison among treatments that use different technologies, such as chemical (eg, ethanol or acetic acid) ablation, thermal therapies (eg, radiofrequency, laser, microwave, focused ultrasound, and cryoablation) and newer ablative modalities such as irreversible electroporation. This updated consensus document provides a framework that will facilitate the clearest communication among investigators regarding ablative technologies. An appropriate vehicle is proposed for reporting the various aspects of image-guided ablation therapy including classification of therapies, procedure terms, descriptors of imaging guidance, and terminology for imaging and pathologic findings. Methods are addressed for standardizing reporting of technique, follow-up, complications, and clinical results. As noted in the original document from 2003, adherence to the recommendations will improve the precision of communications in this field, leading to more accurate comparison of technologies and results, and ultimately to improved patient outcomes.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.jvir.2014.08.027

Cites

82 of 82 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 82 references

Cited by

See all 583

Metadata

Authors
Ahmed, M., Solbiati, L., Brace, C. L., Breen, D. J., Callstrom, M. R., Charboneau, J. W., Chen, M.-H., Choi, B. I., de Baère, T., Dodd, G. D., Dupuy, D. E., Gervais, D. A., Gianfelice, D., Gillams, A. R., Lee, F. T., Leen, E., Lencioni, R., Littrup, P. J., Livraghi, T., Lu, D. S., McGahan, J. P., Meloni, M. F., Nikolic, B., Pereira, P. L., Liang, P., Rhim, H., Rose, S. C., Salem, R., Sofocleous, C. T., Solomon, S. B., Soulen, M. C., Tanaka, M., Vogl, T. J., Wood, B. J., & Goldberg, S. N.
Venue
Journal of Vascular and Interventional Radiology
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2014-11
Volume
25
Issue
11
Pages
1691-1705.e4
ISSN
1051-0443 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2039553081
Cited by
583
References
82
FWCI
20.15
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
bronze

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Image-Guided Tumor Ablation: Standardization of Terminology and Reporting Criteria—A 10-Year Update. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.jvir.2014.08.027
The paper
Ahmed, M., Solbiati, L., Brace, C. L., Breen, D. J., Callstrom, M. R., Charboneau, J. W., Chen, M.-H., Choi, B. I., de Baère, T., Dodd, G. D., Dupuy, D. E., Gervais, D. A., Gianfelice, D., Gillams, A. R., Lee, F. T., Leen, E., Lencioni, R., Littrup, P. J., Livraghi, T., . . . Goldberg, S. N. (2014). Image-Guided Tumor Ablation: Standardization of Terminology and Reporting Criteria—A 10-Year Update. Journal of Vascular and Interventional Radiology. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvir.2014.08.027

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.