Cited by 42Cervical Cancer and HPV ResearchWomen's cancer prevention and managementReproductive tract infections research

Comparison of urine, self-collected vaginal swab, and cervical swab samples for detecting human papillomavirus (HPV) with Roche Cobas HPV, Anyplex II HPV, and RealTime HR-S HPV assay

Cho, Hyun-Woong, Ouh, Yung-Taek, Hong, Jin Hwa, Min, Kyung Jin, So, Kyeong A., Kim, Tae Jin, Paik, E. Sun, Lee, Jeong‐Won +2 more·2019·Journal of Virological Methods

Abstract

Background Human papillomavirus (HPV) is well established as the main cause of cervical cancer. Non-invasive self-collected urine and vaginal sampling have the potential advantage of increasing patient compliance with cervical cancer screening. Methods Self-collected vaginal and urine samples and clinician-collected cervical samples were collected from 101 patients, including 84 patients with high grade squamous intraepithelial lesion and 17 patients with benign ovarian disease. Each sample was evaluated with RealTime HR-S HPV, Anyplex™ II HPV, and Cobas ® HPV assays. The concordance of urine and of self-collected vaginal samples with cervical samples was assessed using the kappa (k) statistic. Results In any high-risk HPV (hrHPV), the concordance of self-collected vaginal and urine samples compared to cervical samples was moderate (k 0.49-0.58) and fair to moderate (k 0.33-0.51), respectively. In HPV 16/18, the concordance of vaginal and urine samples compared to cervical samples was almost perfect (k 0.81-0.86) and moderate to substantial (k 0.59-0.63), respectively. Among the three methods for HPV detection, RealTime HR-S showed the highest concordance with vaginal (k: any hrHPV 0.58, HPV 16/18 0.86) and urine samples (k: any hrHPV 0.51, HPV 16/18 0.63) compared to cervical samples. Conclusion HPV tests using self-collected vaginal samples and urine showed substantial and moderate agreement compared with cervical samples, respectively, although HPV tests using these sample…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.jviromet.2019.04.012

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

No citation lists for this paper

No citation lists for this paper yet — checked again daily.

References 37 · Cited by 42

Authors
Cho, H.-W., Ouh, Y.-T., Hong, J. H., Min, K. J., So, K. A., Kim, T. J., Paik, E. S., Lee, J., Moon, J. H., & Lee, J. K.
Affiliations
  • Korea University (KR)
  • Korea University Ansan Hospital (KR)
  • Konkuk University (KR)
  • Samsung Medical Center (KR)
Corresponding author
Lee, Jae Kwan
Venue
Journal of Virological Methods
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2019-07
Volume
269
Pages
77-82
ISSN
0166-0934 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2936201317
Cited by
42
References
37
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 9 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 9 · 2020: 5
FWCI
3.42
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Virological Methods (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
Ministry of Health and Welfare, Republic of Korea (HI17C2229)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Cervical Cancer and HPV Research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Women's cancer prevention and management
  • Life Sciences › Immunology and Microbiology › Microbiology › Reproductive tract infections research
Keywords
human papillomavirus, HPV testing, urine samples, self-collected vaginal swabs, cervical swabs, cervical cancer screening, non-invasive sampling, HPV 16/18, high-risk HPV, assay concordance
MeSH terms
Adult, Uterine Cervical Dysplasia, Cervix Uteri, DNA, Viral, Female, Humans, Middle Aged, Reagent Kits, Diagnostic, Sensitivity and Specificity, Specimen Handling, Vagina, Vaginal Smears, Papillomaviridae, Papillomavirus Infections, Early Detection of Cancer, Young Adult, Real-Time Polymerase Chain Reaction

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review