Cited by 402Voice and Speech DisordersRespiratory and Cough-Related ResearchDysphagia Assessment and Management

Pathophysiology and Treatment of Muscle Tension Dysphonia: A Review of the Current Knowledge

Van Houtte, Evelyne, Van Lierde, Kristiane, Claeys, Sofie·2011·Journal of Voice

Abstract

Objective Muscle tension dysphonia (MTD) is a clinical and diagnostic term describing a spectrum of disturbed vocal fold behavior caused by increased tension of the (para)laryngeal musculature. Recent knowledge introduced MTD as a bridge between functional and organic disorders. This review addresses the causal and contributing factors of MTD and evaluates the different treatment options. Methods We searched MEDLINE (Pubmed, 1950-2009) and CENTRAL (The Cochrane Library, Issue 2, 2009). Studies were included if they reviewed the classification of functional dysphonia or the pathophysiology of MTD. Etiology and pathophysiology of MTD and circumlaryngeal manual therapy (CMT) were obligatory based on reviews and prospective cohort studies because randomized controlled trials (RCTs) are nonexisting. Concerning the treatment options of voice therapy and vocal hygiene, selection was based on RCTs and systematic reviews. Results Etiological factors can be categorized into three new subgroups: (1) psychological and/or personality factors, (2) vocal misuse and abuse, and (3) compensation for underlying disease. The effective treatment options for MTD are (1) indirect therapy: vocal hygiene and patient education; (2) direct therapy: voice therapy and CMT; (3) medical treatment; and (4) surgery for secondary organic lesions. Conclusions MTD is the pathological condition in which an excessive tension of the (para)laryngeal musculature, caused by a diverse number of etiological factors, leads to a disturbed voice. Etiological factors range from psychological/personality disorders and vocal misuse/abuse to compensatory vocal habits in case of laryngopharyngeal reflux, upper airway infections, and organic lesions. MTD needs to be approached in a multidisciplinary setting where close cooperation between a laryngologist and a speech language pathologist is possible.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.jvoice.2009.10.009

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 50 · Cited by 402

Authors
Van Houtte, E., Van Lierde, K., & Claeys, S.
Affiliations
Ghent University Hospital (BE)
Venue
Journal of Voice
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2011-03
Volume
25
Issue
2
Pages
202-207
ISSN
0892-1997 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2065772006
Cited by
402
References
50
Citations by year
2026: 26 · 2025: 37 · 2024: 31 · 2023: 51 · 2022: 31 · 2021: 38 · 2020: 25 · 2019: 26 · 2018: 31 · 2017: 27 · 2016: 22 · 2015: 15 · 2014: 14 · 2013: 16 · 2012: 10
FWCI
0.92
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Voice (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Ghent University Academic Bibliography (Ghent University) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Voice and Speech Disorders
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine › Respiratory and Cough-Related Research
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Speech and Hearing › Dysphagia Assessment and Management
Keywords
muscle tension dysphonia, functional dysphonia, laryngeal muscle tension, laryngopharyngeal reflux, vocal hygiene, voice therapy, voice disorders
MeSH terms
Humans, Laryngeal Muscles, Muscle Tonus, Phonation, Predictive Value of Tests, Risk Factors, Vocal Cords, Voice Quality, Treatment Outcome, Dysphonia

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review