Cited by 18Voice and Speech DisordersRespiratory and Cough-Related ResearchCommunication in Education and Healthcare

Effect of Muscle Tension Dysphonia on Self-perceived Voice Handicap and Multiparametric Measurement and Their Relation in Female Teachers

Aghadoost, Samira, Jalaie, Shohreh, Dabirmoghaddam, Payman, Khoddami, Seyyedeh Maryam·2022·Journal of Voice

Abstract

Objectives Muscle tension dysphonia (MTD) is a common voice disorder in teachers in which subjective and objective dimensions of quality of voice can be impaired. The study aimed to compare voice handicap index (VHI) and dysphonia severity index (DSI) in teachers with and without MTD as well as study correlation between them. Study design Cross-sectional survey. Method Fifty female teachers were enrolled in the study in two different groups (1) twenty-five teachers with MTD (with mean age of 42.62 ± 3.58 years) and (2) 25 teachers without MTD (with mean age of 44.50 ± 3.49 years). All participants completed the Persian version of VHI and underwent multiparametric measurement of voice by the DSI; these subjective and objective voice measures were compared between two groups and their relation was studied. Results There was significant difference in the VHI, DSI, and their components in teachers with and without MTD (P < 0.05). No significant correlation was found between the total score of VHI and DSI score in the teachers with MTD (r Pearson: 0.04, p: 0.82), although there was significant correlation between them in the teachers without MTD (r Pearson: -0.75, p: 0.001). Conclusion Teachers with MTD demonstrated higher voice handicap and lower voice quality compared to the teachers without MTD. Moreover, dysphonia interrupted relation between the results of self-perceived evaluation and multiparametric measurement of voice in the teachers with MTD in while these assessments were parallel in the healthy teachers. Further studies are recommended to transparent relation between objective and subjective voice assessments in healthy population.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.jvoice.2020.04.011

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 54 · Cited by 18

Authors
Aghadoost, S., Jalaie, S., Dabirmoghaddam, P., & Khoddami, S. M.
Affiliations
Tehran University of Medical Sciences (IR)
Corresponding author
Khoddami, Seyyedeh Maryam
Venue
Journal of Voice
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2022-01
Volume
36
Issue
1
Pages
68-75
ISSN
0892-1997 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3028583880
Cited by
18
References
54
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 1
FWCI
1.17
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Voice (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
Tehran University of Medical Sciences and Health Services
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Voice and Speech Disorders
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine › Respiratory and Cough-Related Research
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Communication in Education and Healthcare
Keywords
muscle tension dysphonia, voice handicap, Voice Handicap Index, Dysphonia Severity Index, women teachers, voice quality, voice disorders
MeSH terms
Adult, Cross-Sectional Studies, Female, Hoarseness, Humans, Middle Aged, Muscle Tonus, Severity of Illness Index, Voice Quality, Dysphonia

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review