Cited by 28

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Volcanic impediments in the progressive development of pre-Columbian civilizations in the Ecuadorian Andes

Hall, Minard L., Mothes, Patricia A.·2008·Journal of Volcanology and Geothermal Research

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.jvolgeores.2008.01.039

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The major explosive crises in Ecuador correspond to the periods 4050-2900, 2400, and 980-810 BP, with deposits of thick ash layers sufficient to destroy all life; the main ash sources in this period were, from north to south, Soche, Pululahua, Pichincha, Cotopaxi, Ninahuilca-Atacazo, Quilotoa, and Tungurahua.

    “Según Hall & Mothes (2008), las mayores crisis explosivas en el Ecuador corresponden a los periodos 4050-2900, 2400 y 980-810 BP, con depósitos de gruesas capas de cenizas suficientes para destruir toda vida; los principales focos suministradores de cenizas en esta época serían, de norte a sur: el Soche, el Pululahua, el Pichincha, el Cotopaxi, el Ninahuilca-Atacazo, el Quilotoa y el Tungurahua.”
  • The Atacazo-Ninahuilca is known for its explosions of 5540, 4440, and 2350-2269 BP, with proven ash deposits throughout the coastal plain at the level of Bahía de Caráquez.

    “El Atacazo-Ninahuilca (Hidalgo et al., 2008;Hall & Mothes, 2008;Zeidler & Isaacson, 1994) es conocido por sus explosiones de 5540, 4440 y 2350-2269 BP, con depósitos comprobados de cenizas en toda la llanura litoral a la altura de Bahía de Caráquez.”
  • The Pululahua eruption of 2400 BP would have considerably affected the Pacific coast, particularly the San Mateo sector near Esmeraldas.

    “Esta última erupción habría afectado bastante a la costa pacífica, particularmente al sector de San Mateo cerca de Esmeraldas (Isaacson, 1994;Hall & Mothes, 2008).”
  • Volcanic ashes from Cotopaxi, Cuicocha, and Quilotoa in Ecuador are very acidic and unfavorable to crops.

    “muy ácidas y desfavorables a los cultivos, caso que se da especialmente, en el Ecuador, con las cenizas provenientes de los volcanes Cotopaxi, Cuicocha y Quilotoa(Hall & Mothes, 2008).”

Citations

Cites

No references could be resolved yet.

Research works printed but not linked: 17

  1. Barba, D., Robin, C., Samaniego, P., Eissen, J.P., in press. Holocene recurrent explosive activity at Chimborazo Volcano (Ecuador). Ecuadorian Special Issue. J. Volcanol. Geotherm. Res.
  2. Barberi, 1988, Plio-Quaternary volcanism in Ecuador, Geol. Mag., 125, 1, 10.1017/S0016756800009328 · DOI
  3. Calvache, 1997, Stratigraphy and chronology of the Galeras volcanic complex, Colombia, vol. 77, 1
  4. Clapperton, 1993, Nature of environmental changes in South America in the Last Glacial Maximum, Palaeogeogr. Palaeoclimatol. Palaeoecol., 101, 189, 10.1016/0031-0182(93)90012-8 · DOI
  5. Clapperton, 1997, A younger Dryas icecap in the equatorial Andes, Quat. Res., 47, 13, 10.1006/qres.1996.1861 · DOI
  6. Hall, 2008, The Rhyolitic–Andesitic eruptive history of Cotopaxi Volcano, Ecuador, Bull. Volcanol., 70, 675, 10.1007/s00445-007-0161-2 · DOI
  7. Hall, M., Mothes, P., in press. Quilotoa Volcano – Ecuador: An overview of young dacitic volcanism in a lake-filled caldera. Ecuadorian Special Issue, Jour. Volcanol. Geothermal Research.
  8. Hall, 1999, Tungurahua Volcano, Ecuador: structure, eruptive history, and hazards, J. Volcanol. Geotherm. Res., 91, 1, 10.1016/S0377-0273(99)00047-5 · DOI
  9. Hidalgo, S., Monzier, M., Almeida, E., Chazot, G., Eissen, J.P., van der Plitch, J., Hall, M.L., in press. Late Pleistocene and Holocene activity of Atacazo–Ninahuilca Volcanic Complex (Ecuador). Ecuadorian Special Issue. J. Volcanol. Geotherm. Res.
  10. Le Pennec, J.L., Jaya, D., Samaniego, P., Ramón, P., Moreno, S., Egred, J., van der Plitch, in press. The AD 1300-1700 eruptive periods at Tungurahua volcano, Ecuador, revealed by historical narratives, stratigraphy and radiocarbon dating. Ecuadorian Special Issue. J. Volcanol. Geotherm. Res.
  11. Monzier, 1999, Sangay volcano, Ecuador: structural development, present activity and petrology, J. Volcanol. Geotherm. Res., 90, 49, 10.1016/S0377-0273(99)00021-9 · DOI
  12. Mothes, P., Hall, M.L., in press. The Plinian Fallout Associated with Quilotoa's 800 y BP Eruption, Ecuadorian Andes. Ecuadorian Special Issue. J. Volcanol. Geotherm. Res.
  13. Mothes, 1998, The enormous Chillos Valley Lahar: an ash-flow-generated debris flow from Cotopaxi Volcano, Ecuador, Bull. Volcanol., 59, 233, 10.1007/s004450050188 · DOI
  14. Mothes, 2004, Character, stratigraphy and magnitude of historical lahars of Cotopaxi volcano (Ecuador), Acta Vulcanol., 16, 85
  15. Robin, C., Samaniego, P., Le Pennec, J.L., Mothes, P., van der Plitch, J., in press. Late Holocene phases of dome growth and Plinian activity at Guagua Pichincha volcano (Ecuador). Ecuadorian Special Issue. J. Volcanol. Geotherm. Res.
  16. Samaniego, 1998, Late Holocene eruptive activity at Nevado Cayambe Volcano, Ecuador. Bull. Volcanol., 59, 451, 10.1007/s004450050203 · DOI
  17. Samaniego, 2005, Temporal evolution of magmatism in the northern volcanic zone of the Andes: The geology and petrology of Cayambe Volcanic Complex (Ecuador), J. Petrol., 46, 2225, 10.1093/petrology/egi053 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Hall, M. L., & Mothes, P. A.
Venue
Journal of Volcanology and Geothermal Research
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2008-10
Volume
176
Issue
3
Pages
344-355
ISSN
0377-0273
Cited by
28
References
0
Language
en

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review