The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Late Pleistocene and Holocene activity of the Atacazo–Ninahuilca Volcanic Complex (Ecuador)
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The Atacazo-Ninahuilca is known for its explosions of 5540, 4440, and 2350-2269 BP, with proven ash deposits throughout the coastal plain at the level of Bahía de Caráquez.
“El Atacazo-Ninahuilca (Hidalgo et al., 2008;Hall & Mothes, 2008;Zeidler & Isaacson, 1994) es conocido por sus explosiones de 5540, 4440 y 2350-2269 BP, con depósitos comprobados de cenizas en toda la llanura litoral a la altura de Bahía de Caráquez.”
From Geodinámica y ocupación humana del litoral pacífico en el sur de colombia y en el ecuador desde el holoceno (últimos 10 000 años) (2010) · cites this paper as Hidalgo et al., 2008
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
No references could be resolved yet.
Research works printed but not linked: 12
- Aquater, 1980, Informe geovolcanológico, Proyecto de investigación Geotérmica de la República del Ecuador, Estudio de Reconocimiento, Informe preparado por Aquater y BRGM para OLADE e INECEL, inédito
- Barba, 2008, Holocene recurrent explosive activity at Chimborazo volcano (Ecuador), Journal of Volcanology and Geothermal Research, 176, 27, 10.1016/j.jvolgeores.2008.05.004 · DOI
- Barberi, 1988, Plio-Quaternary volcanism in Ecuador, Geological Magazine, 125, 1, 10.1017/S0016756800009328 · DOI
- Bronk Ramsey, C., 2003. OxCal v. 3.9, Oxford.
- Fierstein, 1992, Another look at the calculation of fallout tephra volumes, Bulletin of Volcanology, 54, 156, 10.1007/BF00278005 · DOI
- Hall, 1994, Tefroestratigrafía Holocénica de los Volcanes Principales del Valle Interandino, Ecuador, Estudios de Geografía, 6, 47
- Hunter, 1985, A kinematic model for the structure of lee side deposits, Sedimentology, 32, 409, 10.1111/j.1365-3091.1985.tb00520.x · DOI
- Kelfoun, 2005, Numerical modeling of the emplacement of Socompa rock avalanche, Chile, Journal of Geophysical Research, 110, B12202.1, 10.1029/2005JB003758 · DOI
- Legros, 2000, Minimum volume of tephra fallout deposit estimated from a single isopach, Journal of Volcanology and Geothermal Research, 96, 25, 10.1016/S0377-0273(99)00135-3 · DOI
- Newhall, 1982, The volcanic explosivity index (VEI): an estimate of explosive magnitude for historical volcanism, Journal of Geophysical Research, 87, 1231, 10.1029/JC087iC02p01231 · DOI
- Pyle, 1989, The thickness, volume and grainsize of tephra fall deposits, Bulletin of Volcanology, 51, 1, 10.1007/BF01086757 · DOI
- Samaniego, 1998, Late Holocene eruptive activity at Nevado Cayambe Volcano, Ecuador, Bulletin of Volcanology, 59, 451, 10.1007/s004450050203 · DOI
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Usselmann, P. (2010) · Bulletin de l’Institut français d’études andines · doi:10.4000/bifea.1798 · Cited by 1
Metadata
- Authors
- Hidalgo, S., Monzier, M., Almeida, E., Chazot, G., Eissen, J.-P., van der Plicht, J., & Hall, M. L.
- Venue
- Journal of Volcanology and Geothermal Research
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2008-09
- Volume
- 176
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 16-26
- ISSN
- 0377-0273
- Cited by
- 29
- References
- 0
- Language
- en
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
