Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 309

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 19 of the 19 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

A systematic review of endovascular treatment of extensive aortoiliac occlusive disease

Open access
Jongkind, Vincent, Akkersdijk, George J.M., Yeung, Kak K., Wisselink, Willem·2010·Journal of Vascular Surgery

Abstract

OBJECTIVES Current multidisciplinary guidelines recommend to treat extensive aortoiliac occlusive disease (AIOD) by surgical revascularization. Surgery provides good long-term patency, but at the cost of substantial perioperative morbidity. Development of new technologies and techniques has led to increased use of endovascular therapy for extensive AIOD. We performed a systematic review of the literature to determine contemporary short- and long-term results of endovascular therapy for extensive AIOD. METHODS The Medline, Embase, and Cochrane databases were searched to identify all studies reporting endovascular treatment of extensive AIOD (TransAtlantic Inter-Society Consensus (TASC) type C and D) from January 2000 to June 2009. Two independent observers selected studies for inclusion, assessed the methodologic quality of the included studies, and performed the data extraction. Outcomes were technical success, clinical success, mortality, complications, long-term primary, and secondary patency rates. RESULTS Nineteen nonrandomized cohort studies reporting on 1711 patients were included. There was substantial clinical heterogeneity between the studies considering study population and interventional techniques. Technical success was achieved in 86% to 100% of the patients. Clinical symptoms improved in 83% to 100%. Mortality was described in seven studies and ranged from 1.2% to 6.7%. Complications were reported in 3% to 45% of the patients. Most common complications were distal embolization, access site hematomas, pseudoaneurysms, arterial ruptures, and arterial dissections. The majority of complications could be treated using percutaneous or noninvasive techniques. Four- or 5-year primary and secondary patency rates ranged from 60% to 86% and 80% to 98%, respectively. CONCLUSIONS Endovascular treatment of extensive AIOD can be performed successfully by experienced interventionists in selected patients. Although primary patency rates are lower than those reported for surgical revascularization, reinterventions can often be performed percutaneously, with secondary patency comparable to surgical repair.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.jvs.2010.04.080

Cites

19 of 19 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 19 references

Cited by

See all 309

Metadata

Authors
Jongkind, V., Akkersdijk, G. J. M., Yeung, K. K., & Wisselink, W.
Venue
Journal of Vascular Surgery
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2010-11
Volume
52
Issue
5
Pages
1376-1383
ISSN
0741-5214 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2165276747
Cited by
309
References
19
FWCI
1.31
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
bronze

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: A systematic review of endovascular treatment of extensive aortoiliac occlusive disease. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.jvs.2010.04.080
The paper
Jongkind, V., Akkersdijk, G. J. M., Yeung, K. K., & Wisselink, W. (2010). A systematic review of endovascular treatment of extensive aortoiliac occlusive disease. Journal of Vascular Surgery. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvs.2010.04.080

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.