The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Variation in thromboembolic complications among patients undergoing commonly performed cancer operations
Open accessAbstract
Objective There is widespread evidence that cancer confers an increased risk of deep venous thrombosis (DVT). This risk is thought to vary among different cancer types. The purpose of this study is to better define the incidence of thrombotic complications among patients undergoing surgical treatment for a spectrum of prevalent cancer diagnoses in contemporary practice. Methods All patients undergoing one of 11 cancer surgical operations (breast resection, hysterectomy, prostatectomy, colectomy, gastrectomy, lung resection, hepatectomy, pancreatectomy, cystectomy, esophagectomy, and nephrectomy) were identified by Current Procedural Terminology and International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision codes using the American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program database (2007–2009). The study endpoints were DVT, pulmonary embolism (PE), and overall postoperative venous thromboembolic events (VTE) within 1 month of the index procedure. Multivariate logistic regression was utilized to calculate adjusted odds ratios for each endpoint. Results Over the study interval, 43,808 of the selected cancer operations were performed. The incidence of DVT, PE, and total VTE within 1 month following surgery varied widely across a spectrum of cancer diagnoses, ranging from 0.19%, 0.12%, and 0.28% for breast resection to 6.1%, 2.4%, and 7.3%, respectively, for esophagectomy. Compared with breast cancer, the incidence of VTE ranged from a 1.31-fold increase in VTE associated with gastrectomy (95% confidence interval, 0.73–2.37; P = .4) to a 2.68-fold increase associated with hysterectomy (95% confidence interval, 1.43–5.01; P = .002). Multivariate logistic regression revealed that inpatient status, steroid use, advanced age (≥60 years), morbid obesity (body mass index ≥35), blood transfusion, reintubation, cardiac arrest, postoperative infectious complications, and prolonged hospitalization were independently associated with increased risk of VTE. Conclusions The incidence of VTE and thromboembolic complications associated with cancer surgery varies substantially. These findings suggest that both tumor type and resection magnitude may impact VTE risk. Accordingly, such data support diagnosis and procedural-specific guidelines for perioperative VTE prophylaxis and can be used to anticipate the risk of potentially preventable morbidity.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Malignancies, prothrombotic mutations, and the risk of venous thrombosis
Blom, J. W. (2005) · JAMA · doi:10.1001/jama.293.6.715 · Cited by 1,949
Cited by
Walker, A. J., Card, T. R., West, J., Crooks, C., & Grainge, M. J. (2013) · European Journal of Cancer · doi:10.1016/j.ejca.2012.10.021 · Cited by 512
Metadata
- Authors
- De Martino, R. R., Goodney, P. P., Spangler, E. L., Wallaert, J. B., Corriere, M. A., Rzucidlo, E. M., Walsh, D. B., & Stone, D. H.
- Venue
- Journal of Vascular Surgery
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2012-04
- Volume
- 55
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 1035-1040.e4
- ISSN
- 0741-5214 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2013419730
- Cited by
- 171
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 9.98
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Variation in thromboembolic complications among patients undergoing commonly performed cancer operations. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.jvs.2011.10.129
- The paper
- De Martino, R. R., Goodney, P. P., Spangler, E. L., Wallaert, J. B., Corriere, M. A., Rzucidlo, E. M., Walsh, D. B., & Stone, D. H. (2012). Variation in thromboembolic complications among patients undergoing commonly performed cancer operations. Journal of Vascular Surgery. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvs.2011.10.129
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.