Factors associated with successful median arcuate ligament release in an international, multi-institutional cohort
Open accessAbstract
Objective Prior research on median arcuate ligament syndrome has been limited to institutional case series, making the optimal approach to median arcuate ligament release (MALR) and resulting outcomes unclear. In the present study, we compared the outcomes of different approaches to MALR and determined the predictors of long-term treatment failure. Methods The Vascular Low Frequency Disease Consortium is an international, multi-institutional research consortium. Data on open, laparoscopic, and robotic MALR performed from 2000 to 2020 were gathered. The primary outcome was treatment failure, defined as no improvement in median arcuate ligament syndrome symptoms after MALR or symptom recurrence between MALR and the last clinical follow-up. Results For 516 patients treated at 24 institutions, open, laparoscopic, and robotic MALR had been performed in 227 (44.0%), 235 (45.5%), and 54 (10.5%) patients, respectively. Perioperative complications (ileus, cardiac, and wound complications; readmissions; unplanned procedures) occurred in 19.2% (open, 30.0%; laparoscopic, 8.9%; robotic, 18.5%; P < .001). The median follow-up was 1.59 years (interquartile range, 0.38-4.35 years). For the 488 patients with follow-up data available, 287 (58.8%) had had full relief, 119 (24.4%) had had partial relief, and 82 (16.8%) had derived no benefit from MALR. The 1- and 3-year freedom from treatment failure for the overall cohort was 63.8% (95% confidence interval [CI], 59.0%-68.3%) and 51.9% (95% CI, 46.1%-57.3%), respectively. The factors associated with an increased hazard of treatment failure on multivariable analysis included robotic MALR (hazard ratio [HR], 1.73; 95% CI, 1.16-2.59; P = .007), a history of gastroparesis (HR, 1.83; 95% CI, 1.09-3.09; P = .023), abdominal cancer (HR, 10.3; 95% CI, 3.06-34.6; P < .001), dysphagia and/or odynophagia (HR, 2.44; 95% CI, 1.27-4.69; P = .008), no relief from a celiac plexus block (HR, 2.18; 95% CI, 1.00-4.72; P = .049), and an increasing number of preoperative pain locations (HR, 1.12 per location; 95% CI, 1.00-1.25; P = .042). The factors associated with a lower hazard included increasing age (HR, 0.99 per increasing year; 95% CI, 0.98-1.0; P = .012) and an increasing number of preoperative diagnostic gastrointestinal studies (HR, 0.84 per study; 95% CI, 0.74-0.96; P = .012) Open and laparoscopic MALR resulted in similar long-term freedom from treatment failure. No radiographic parameters were associated with differences in treatment failure. Conclusions No difference was found in long-term failure after open vs laparoscopic MALR; however, open release was associated with higher perioperative morbidity. These results support the use of a preoperative celiac plexus block to aid in patient selection. Operative candidates for MALR should be counseled regarding the factors associated with treatment failure and the relatively high overall rate of treatment failure.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Timely recognition and treatment is associated with better outcomes in MALS.
“This observation is important since timely recognition and treatment is associated with better outcomes.”
Typical patients are 40 years old at intervention and 73% are female.
“Typical patients are 40 years old at intervention and 73% are female.”
In an international, multicentre, retrospective observational study including 516 patients with MALS, freedom from treatment failure at three year follow up was 62% after laparoscopic CA release and 44% after open release.
“In an international, multicentre, retrospective observational study including 516 patients with MALS, freedom from treatment failure at three year follow up was 62% after laparoscopic CA release and 44% after open release.”
Absence of symptom relief after coeliac plexus blockade was associated with treatment failure (HR 2.18, 95% CI 1.00-4.72) in the 71 patients who had such blockade pre-operatively.
“An interesting observation in this study was the association between absence of symptom relief after coeliac plexus blockade and treatment failure (hazard ratio [HR] 2.18, 95% CI 1.00 e 4.72) in the 71 patients who had such blockade pre-operatively.”
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 31 · Cited by 53
- Authors
- DeCarlo, C., Woo, K., van Petersen, A. S., Geelkerken, R. H., Chen, A. J., Yeh, S. L., Kim, G. Y., Henke, P. K., Tracci, M. C., Schneck, M. B., Grotemeyer, D., Meyer, B., DeMartino, R. R., Wilkins, P. B., Iranmanesh, S., Rastogi, V., Aulivola, B., Korepta, L. M., Shutze, W. P., Jett, K. G., Sorber, R., Abularrage, C. J., Long, G. W., Bove, P. G., Davies, M. G., Miserlis, D., Shih, M., Yi, J., Gupta, R., Loa, J., Robinson, D. A., Gombert, A., Doukas, P., de Caridi, G., Benedetto, F., Wittgen, C. M., Smeds, M. R., Sumpio, B. E., Harris, S., Szeberin, Z., Pomozi, E., Stilo, F., Montelione, N., Mouawad, N. J., Lawrence, P., & Dua, A.
- Affiliations
- Massachusetts General Hospital (US)
- University of California, Los Angeles (US)
- Medisch Spectrum Twente (NL)
- University of Michigan (US)
- University of Virginia (US)
- Hôpital Kirchberg (LU)
- Mayo Clinic (US)
- Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center (US)
- Loyola University Medical Center (US)
- Heart Hospital Baylor Plano (US)
- Johns Hopkins University (US)
- Oakland University (US)
- The University of Texas at San Antonio Health Science Center (US)
- The University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center (US)
- University of Colorado Anschutz (US)
- Royal Prince Alfred Hospital (AU)
- Universitätsklinikum Aachen (DE)
- University of Messina (IT)
- Saint Louis University (US)
- Yale University (US)
- Semmelweis University (HU)
- Università Campus Bio-Medico (IT)
- McLaren Health Care (US)
- Corresponding author
- DeCarlo, Charles
- ORCID
- DeCarlo, Charles
- Woo, Karen
- Geelkerken, Robert H.
- Chen, Alina J.
- Yeh, Savannah L.
- Kim, Gloria Y.
- Henke, Peter K.
- Schneck, Matthew B.
- DeMartino, Randall R.
- Wilkins, Parvathi B.
- Rastogi, Vinamr
- Aulivola, Bernadette
- Korepta, Lindsey M.
- Shutze, William P.
- Sorber, Rebecca
- Abularrage, Christopher J.
- Bove, Paul G.
- Davies, Mark G.
- Miserlis, Dimitrios
- Yi, Jeniann
- Loa, Jacky
- Gombert, Alexander
- Benedetto, Filippo
- Wittgen, Catherine M.
- Sumpio, Bauer E.
- Pomozi, Enikő
- Stilo, Francesco
- Montelione, Nunzio
- Mouawad, Nicolas J.
- Lawrence, Peter
- Dua, Anahita
- Venue
- Journal of Vascular Surgery
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2023-02
- Volume
- 77
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 567-577.e2
- ISSN
- 0741-5214 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W4307236711
- Cited by
- 53
- References
- 31
- Citations by year
- 2026: 15 · 2025: 21 · 2024: 9 · 2023: 8
- FWCI
- 9.08
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- Journal of Vascular Surgery (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- RWTH Publications (RWTH Aachen) (publishedVersion)
- University of Twente Research Information (submittedVersion)
- Funders
- National Center for Advancing Translational Sciences (UL1TR001881)
- National Institutes of Health
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Abdominal vascular conditions and treatments
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Vascular anomalies and interventions
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine › Renal and Vascular Pathologies
- Keywords
- median arcuate ligament syndrome, median arcuate ligament release, treatment failure, robotic surgery, laparoscopic surgery, open surgery, gastroparesis, abdominal cancer, perioperative complications, predictors of treatment failure, long-term outcomes, symptom recurrence, surgical approach comparison
- MeSH terms
- Median Arcuate Ligament Syndrome, Celiac Artery, Humans, Ligaments, Laparoscopy, Abdominal Pain, Treatment Failure
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review