Clinical features of patients with endometriosis on the cesarean scar
Open accessAbstract
To the Editor, Endometriosis is defined as the presence and proliferation of the endometrium outside the uterine cavity, with the pelvis being the most common site. Subcutaneous endometriosis near the cesarean delivery scar is a rare form of extrapelvic endometriosis, occurring in 0.03–1.5% of all women having cesarean deliveries [1]. We retrospectively reviewed the data of five patients with endometriosis on the cesarean scar at the Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology of the Ege University Medical School (Izmir, Turkey) and Buca Government Hospital (Buca, Izmir, Turkey), from 2006 to 2012. Total excision of lesions was performed in all patients. All patients had pathologically confirmed endometriosis in the scar tissue (Fig. 1). The clinical features of the patients are shown in Table 1. Abdominal wall pain and palpable mass especially during menstrual days were the major complaints in all patients. All patients had a history of at least one previous cesarean section and none of them had other abdominopelvic surgeries. The mean diameter of the removed masses was 2.7 cm (range, 2–4 cm). The endometriotic lesions presented 19–46 months (mean, 30 months) after the cesarean procedure. On physical examination, extreme tenderness and semimobile or fixed nodular mass were palpated just above the right/left lateral edge of the Pfannenstiel incision scars. One patient had a bilateral endometriotic lesion. The CA-125 level rose above 35 U/mL in only one patient. Preoperatively, all patients had undergone abdominal ultrasonography. The masses in or around the cesarean scar in these patients appeared hyperechoic and irregular by ultrasonography. Surgical removal was performed with a wide excision providing clear margins in all patients with scar endometriosis (Fig. 2). The endometriotic lesions showed no involvement of the fascia. In the postoperative period, no patients required medical treatment. The abdominal wall pain and tenderness disappeared after the postoperative period in all patients. No recurrence occurred during the follow-up period. Endometrial glands have a similar appearance; endometrial epithelium is seen in the stroma: (A) hematoxylin and eosin (H&E), ×20; (B) Estrogen receptor (ER), ×10. Endometriosis on the cesarean scar: dissection and excision of (A) bilateral lesion and (B) after resection. Cesarean scar endometriosis is a very rare disease; however, it may occur more commonly than believed [2]. Scar endometriosis is mostly seen after a cesarean section but can also occur after hysterectomy, hysterotomy, tubal surgeries, appendectomy, amniocentesis, or episiotomy [3]-[5]. The pain typically starts after the operation. The diagnosis is confirmed histopathologically. In the differential diagnosis, there are granulomas due to the sutures, incisional hernia, lipoma, foreign bodies, and cysts [4]. Abdominal wall sonography, computerized tomography, and magnetic resonance imaging may be helpful for the diagnosis. In the presented cases, the patients' complaints had started about 3 years after the cesarean section. The mechanism of the disease is still controversial. The pathogenesis of abdominal wall endometriosis is best explained by the iatrogenic direct implantation theory — during the surgical procedure, endometrial tissue is seeded into the wound. One of the other theories suggests that the postoperative scar endometriosis risk increases when the visceral or parietal peritoneum remains open during the surgery [4]. However, this theory alone is not enough to completely explain the pathophysiology given the low incidence of this disease and the reports on scar endometriosis without previous surgery. Coelomic metaplasia, lymphatic dissemination, or hematogenic dissemination may also be responsible for the disease. The lesions are mainly treated by surgical excision. The alternative methods to surgery are oral contraceptives, progestins, medroxyprogesterone acetate, or GnRH agonists. However, recurrences after the medical treatments may still occur. We did not administer any medical therapy after the operation, because the endometriotic lesions were removed surgically with a wide excision providing clear margins in all patients. In conclusion, abdominal wall endometriosis should be kept in mind for females complaining of mass or pain in or around the scar after a cesarean section or hysterectomy. It is a rare entity; however, its incidence may arise because of the increasing number of cesarean procedures being performed.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The presence of AWE in the surgery scar is quite infrequent.
“The presence of AWE in the surgery scar is quite infrequent.”
From 5-Year data analysis of patients following abdominal wall endometrioma surgery (2014) · cites this paper as [17]
Series of one, five, and six scar endometriosis cases had been reported earlier.
“The series of one, five, and six scar endometriosis had been reported earlier [11,16,17].”
From 5-Year data analysis of patients following abdominal wall endometrioma surgery (2014) · cites this paper as [17]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 7 · Cited by 11
- Authors
- Akdemir, A., Akman, L., Yavuzsen, H. T., & Zekioglu, O.
- Affiliations
- Ege University (TR)
- Corresponding author
- Akman, Levent
- Venue
- The Kaohsiung Journal of Medical Sciences
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2014-01-08
- Volume
- 30
- Issue
- 10
- Pages
- 541-543
- ISSN
- 1607-551X (ISSN-L)
- 2410-8650
- PMC
- PMC11916398
- OpenAlex
- W2038708078
- Cited by
- 11
- References
- 7
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2025: 1 · 2022: 1 · 2020: 1 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 1 · 2014: 1
- FWCI
- 0.81
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- The Kaohsiung Journal of Medical Sciences (publishedVersion)
- Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion)
- PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Reproductive Medicine › Endometriosis Research and Treatment
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Ectopic Pregnancy Diagnosis and Management
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Obstetrics and Gynecology › Gynecological conditions and treatments
- Keywords
- cesarean section scar, extrapelvic endometriosis, abdominal wall pain, surgical excision, CA125, postoperative recurrence
- MeSH terms
- Adult, Cesarean Section, Cicatrix, Endometriosis, Female, Humans
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review