Cited by 56Intelligent Tutoring Systems and Adaptive LearningArtificial Intelligence in EducationOnline Learning and Analytics

Reinforcement learning of pedagogical policies in adaptive and intelligent educational systems

Open access
Iglesias, Ana, Martínez, Paloma, Aler, Ricardo, Fernández, Fernando·2009·Knowledge-Based Systems

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.knosys.2009.01.007

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • This presents a great opportunity for AI's applications in education for further enhancing students' learning outcomes, reducing teachers' workloads and making learning personalized, interactive and fun for teachers and students.

    “This presents a great opportunity for AI’s applications in education for further enhancing students’ learning outcomes, reducing teachers’ workloads [30] and making learning personalized [64], interactive and fun [50, 53] for teachers and students.”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 9 · Cited by 56

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. B. Carr, I. Goldstein, Overlays: A teory of modeling for computer aided instruction, Technical report ai memo 406, AI Laboratory, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA, 1977.
  2. A. Iglesias, P. Martínez, R. Aler, F. Fernández, Learning pedagogical policies from few training data, in: Proceedings of the 17th European Conference on Artificial Intelligence, Workshop on Planning, Learning and Monitoring with Uncertainty and Dynamic Worlds, Riva del Garda (Italy), 2006, pp. 13-18.

Authors
Iglesias, A., Martínez, P., Aler, R., & Fernández, F.
Affiliations
Universidad Carlos III de Madrid (ES)
Corresponding author
Iglesias, Ana
Venue
Knowledge-Based Systems
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2009-05
Volume
22
Issue
4
Pages
266-270
ISSN
0950-7051 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2000976551
Cited by
56
References
9
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 7 · 2020: 11 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 1 · 2013: 1 · 2012: 3
FWCI
3.61
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Knowledge-Based Systems (publishedVersion)
  • e-Archivo (Carlos III University of Madrid) (acceptedVersion)
  • LA Referencia (Red Federada de Repositorios Institucionales de Publicaciones Científicas) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Intelligent Tutoring Systems and Adaptive Learning
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Artificial Intelligence in Education
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Science Applications › Online Learning and Analytics
Keywords
reinforcement learning, simulated students, personalized learning paths, computer science education, undergraduate students

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review