The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Optimal parameters selection for BP neural network based on particle swarm optimization: A case study of wind speed forecasting
Open accessAbstract
As a clean and renewable energy source, wind energy has been increasingly gaining global attention. Wind speed forecast is of great significance for wind energy domain: planning and design of wind farms, wind farm operation control, wind power prediction, power grid operation scheduling, and more. Many wind speed forecasting algorithms have been proposed to improve prediction accuracy. Few of them, however, have studied how to select input parameters carefully to achieve desired results. After introducing a Back Propagation neural network based on Particle Swam Optimization (PSO-BP), this paper details a method called IS-PSO-BP that combines PSO-BP with comprehensive parameter selection. The IS-PSO-BP is short for Input parameter Selection (IS)-PSO-BP, where IS stands for Input parameter Selection. To evaluate the forecast performance of proposed approach, this paper uses daily average wind speed data of Jiuquan and 6-hourly wind speed data of Yumen, Gansu of China from 2001 to 2006 as a case study. The experiment results clearly show that for these two particular datasets, the proposed method achieves much better forecast performance than the basic back propagation neural network and ARIMA model.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Learning representations by back-propagating errors
Rumelhart, D. E., Hinton, G. E., & Williams, R. J. (1986) · Nature · doi:10.1038/323533a0 · Cited by 31,892
Cited by
Ahmed, R., Sreeram, V., Mishra, Y., & Arif, M. D. (2020) · Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews · doi:10.1016/j.rser.2020.109792 · Cited by 1,259
Liu, H., Mi, X.-W., & Li, Y.-F. (2018) · Energy Conversion and Management · doi:10.1016/j.enconman.2017.11.053 · Cited by 474
Karami, A. (2015) · Journal of Network and Computer Applications · doi:10.1016/j.jnca.2015.05.017 · Cited by 29
Zheng, M., Tang, W., Ogundiran, A., & Yang, J. (2020) · Sustainability · doi:10.3390/su12114748 · Cited by 19
Metadata
- Authors
- Ren, C., An, N., Wang, J., Li, L., Hu, B., & Shang, D.
- Venue
- Knowledge-Based Systems
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2014-01
- Volume
- 56
- Pages
- 226-239
- ISSN
- 0950-7051 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2021826571
- Cited by
- 530
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 13.98
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Optimal parameters selection for BP neural network based on particle swarm optimization: A case study of wind speed forecasting. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.knosys.2013.11.015
- The paper
- Ren, C., An, N., Wang, J., Li, L., Hu, B., & Shang, D. (2014). Optimal parameters selection for BP neural network based on particle swarm optimization: A case study of wind speed forecasting. Knowledge-Based Systems. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.knosys.2013.11.015
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.