The DOI matches its Crossref record; 81 of the 81 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Web data extraction, applications and techniques: A survey
Open accessAbstract
Web Data Extraction is an important problem that has been studied by means of different scientific tools and in a broad range of applications. Many approaches to extracting data from the Web have been designed to solve specific problems and operate in ad-hoc domains. Other approaches, instead, heavily reuse techniques and algorithms developed in the field of Information Extraction.This survey aims at providing a structured and comprehensive overview of the literature in the field of Web Data Extraction. We provided a simple classification framework in which existing Web Data Extraction applications are grouped into two main classes, namely applications at the Enterprise level and at the Social Web level. At the Enterprise level, Web Data Extraction techniques emerge as a key tool to perform data analysis in Business and Competitive Intelligence systems as well as for business process re-engineering. At the Social Web level, Web Data Extraction techniques allow to gather a large amount of structured data continuously generated and disseminated by Web 2.0, Social Media and Online Social Network users and this offers unprecedented opportunities to analyze human behavior at a very large scale. We discuss also the potential of cross-fertilization, i.e., on the possibility of re-using Web Data Extraction techniques originally designed to work in a given domain, in other domains.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Data mining: concepts and techniques
(2012) · Choice Reviews Online · doi:10.5860/choice.49-3305 · Cited by 28,531
Pan, S. J., & Yang, Q. (2010) · IEEE Transactions on Knowledge and Data Engineering · doi:10.1109/tkde.2009.191 · Cited by 23,387
The Structure and Function of Complex Networks
Newman, M. E. J. (2003) · SIAM Review · doi:10.1137/s003614450342480 · Cited by 18,719
Foundations of statistical natural language processing
Manning, C. D., & Schütze, H. (1999) · Cited by 9,816
Machine learning in automated text categorization
Sebastiani, F. (2002) · ACM Computing Surveys · doi:10.1145/505282.505283 · Cited by 7,926
What is Twitter, a social network or a news media?
Kwak, H., Lee, C., Park, H., & Moon, S. (2010) · Proceedings of the 19th international conference on World wide web · doi:10.1145/1772690.1772751 · Cited by 6,652
The small-world problem: (400002009-005)
Milgram, S. (1967) · PsycEXTRA Dataset · doi:10.1037/e400002009-005 · Cited by 4,790
Data Mining: Concepts and Techniques
Thamaraiselvi, G., & Kaliammal, A. (2014) · Journal of Information and Knowledge · Cited by 4,088
A survey of approaches to automatic schema matching
Rahm, E., & Bernstein, P. A. (2001) · The VLDB Journal · doi:10.1007/s007780100057 · Cited by 3,352
A maximum entropy approach to natural language processing
Berger, A. L., Pietra, V. J. D., & Pietra, S. A. D. (1996) · doi:10.5555/234285.234289 · Cited by 3,065
Metadata
- Authors
- Ferrara, E., De Meo, P., Fiumara, G., & Baumgartner, R.
- Venue
- Knowledge-Based Systems
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2014-11
- Volume
- 70
- Pages
- 301-323
- ISSN
- 0950-7051 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2148317291
- Cited by
- 396
- References
- 81
- FWCI
- 116.49
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Web data extraction, applications and techniques: A survey. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.knosys.2014.07.007
- The paper
- Ferrara, E., De Meo, P., Fiumara, G., & Baumgartner, R. (2014). Web data extraction, applications and techniques: A survey. Knowledge-Based Systems. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.knosys.2014.07.007
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.