Cited by 195Robotic Path Planning AlgorithmsVehicle Dynamics and Control SystemsAutonomous Vehicle Technology and Safety

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 33 of the 35 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

A unified motion planning method for parking an autonomous vehicle in the presence of irregularly placed obstacles

Open access
Li, Bai, Shao, Zhijiang·2015·Knowledge-Based Systems

Abstract

This paper proposes a motion planner for autonomous parking. Compared to the prevailing and emerging studies that handle specific or regular parking scenarios only, our method describes various kinds of parking cases in a unified way regardless they are regular parking scenarios (e.g., parallel, perpendicular or echelon parking cases) or not. First, we formulate a time-optimal dynamic optimization problem with vehicle kinematics, collision-avoidance conditions and mechanical constraints strictly described. Thereafter, an interior-point simultaneous approach is introduced to solve that formulated dynamic optimization problem. Simulation results validate that our proposed motion planning method can tackle general parking scenarios. The tested parking scenarios in this paper can be regarded as benchmark cases to evaluate the efficiency of methods that may emerge in the future. Our established dynamic optimization problem is an open and unified framework, where other complicated user-specific constraints/optimization criteria can be handled without additional difficulty, provided that they are expressed through inequalities/polynomial explicitly. This proposed motion planner may be suitable for the next-generation intelligent parking-garage system.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.knosys.2015.04.016

Cites

33 of 33 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Show all 35 references

2 of the 35 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. W. Yang, Optimal Approach for Autonomous Parallel Parking of Nonholonomic Car-Like Vehicle, M.S. Thesis, Department of Mechanical & Aerospace Engineering, State University of New York at Buffalo, New York, 2006.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Items 101–195 of 195

Metadata

Authors
Li, B., & Shao, Z.
Affiliations
  • Zhejiang University (CN)
  • State Key Laboratory of Industrial Control Technology (CN)
Corresponding author
Shao, Zhijiang
Venue
Knowledge-Based Systems
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2015-09
Volume
86
Pages
11-20
ISSN
0950-7051 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2027311349
Cited by
195
References
35
Citations by year
2026: 13 · 2025: 31 · 2024: 17 · 2023: 26 · 2022: 17 · 2021: 20 · 2020: 15 · 2019: 18 · 2018: 11 · 2017: 13 · 2016: 8 · 2015: 6
FWCI
10.99
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
Knowledge-Based Systems (publishedVersion, cc-by)
Funders
  • Program of China (2012CB720503)
  • National Nature Science Foundation (61374167)
  • 6th National College Students’ Innovation & Entrepreneurial Training Program (201210006050)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Control and Systems Engineering › Robotic Path Planning Algorithms
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Automotive Engineering › Vehicle Dynamics and Control Systems
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Automotive Engineering › Autonomous Vehicle Technology and Safety
Keywords
autonomous parking, motion planning, irregular obstacles, time-optimal control, dynamic optimization, vehicle kinematics, collision avoidance, interior point methods, parallel parking, perpendicular parking

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review