The DOI matches its Crossref record; 48 of the 48 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
MLACO: A multi-label feature selection algorithm based on ant colony optimization
Abstract
Abstract Nowadays, with emerge the multi-label datasets, the multi-label learning processes attracted interest and increasingly applied to different fields. In such learning processes, unlike single-label learning, instances have more than one class label simultaneously. Also, multi-label learning suffers from the curse of dimensionality, and thus, the feature selection becomes a difficult task. In this paper, we propose a novel multi-label relevance–redundancy feature selection method based on Ant colony optimization (ACO) for the first time, called MLACO. By introducing two unsupervised and supervised heuristic functions, MLACO tries to search in the features space to find the most promising features with the lowest redundancy (unsupervised) and highest relevancy with class labels (supervised) through several iterations. For speeding up the convergence of the algorithm, the normalized cosine similarity between features and class labels have been used as the initial pheromone of each ant. The proposed method does not take into account any learning algorithm, and it can be classified as a filter-based method. We compare the performance of the MLACO against five well-known and state-of-the-art feature selection methods using ML-KNN classifier. The experimental results on several frequently used datasets show the superiority of the MLACO in different multi-label evaluation measures criteria and runtime.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Wrappers for feature subset selection
Kohavi, R., & John, G. H. (1997) · Artificial Intelligence · doi:10.1016/s0004-3702(97)00043-x · Cited by 8,947
An introduction to variable and feature selection
GuyonIsabelle, & ElisseeffAndré (2003) · Journal of Machine Learning Research · doi:10.5555/944919.944968 · Cited by 7,715
(2007) · Handbook of Approximation Algorithms and Metaheuristics · doi:10.1201/9781420010749-33 · Cited by 6,607
An Introduction to Variable and Feature Selection.
Guyon, I., & Elisseeff, A. (2003) · Cited by 6,576
Handbook of Parametric and Nonparametric Statistical Procedures
(2004) · Technometrics · doi:10.1198/tech.2004.s209 · Cited by 4,661
ML-KNN: A lazy learning approach to multi-label learning
Zhang, M.-L., & Zhou, Z.-H. (2007) · Pattern Recognition · doi:10.1016/j.patcog.2006.12.019 · Cited by 3,552
A Review on Multi-Label Learning Algorithms
Zhang, M.-L., & Zhou, Z.-H. (2014) · IEEE Transactions on Knowledge and Data Engineering · doi:10.1109/tkde.2013.39 · Cited by 3,321
Selection of relevant features and examples in machine learning
Blum, A. L., & Langley, P. (1997) · Artificial Intelligence · doi:10.1016/s0004-3702(97)00063-5 · Cited by 3,298
Ant Algorithms for Discrete Optimization
Dorigo, M., Caro, G. D., & Gambardella, L. M. (1999) · Artificial Life · doi:10.1162/106454699568728 · Cited by 2,808
Metaheuristics : from desing to implementation
Talbi, E. (2009) · HAL · Cited by 2,494
Cited by
Mafarja, M., Thaher, T., Al-Betar, M. A., Too, J., Awadallah, M. A., Abu Doush, I., & Turabieh, H. (2023) · Applied Intelligence · doi:10.1007/s10489-022-04427-x · Cited by 91
Metadata
- Authors
- Paniri, M., Dowlatshahi, M. B., & Nezamabadi-pour, H.
- Venue
- Knowledge-Based Systems
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2020-03
- Volume
- 192
- Pages
- 105285
- ISSN
- 0950-7051 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2992732987
- Cited by
- 285
- References
- 48
- FWCI
- 12.89
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: MLACO: A multi-label feature selection algorithm based on ant colony optimization. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.knosys.2019.105285
- The paper
- Paniri, M., Dowlatshahi, M. B., & Nezamabadi-pour, H. (2020). MLACO: A multi-label feature selection algorithm based on ant colony optimization. Knowledge-Based Systems. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.knosys.2019.105285
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.