The DOI matches its Crossref record; 4 of the 4 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Chaotic random spare ant colony optimization for multi-threshold image segmentation of 2D Kapur entropy
Abstract
Abstract Although the continuous version of ant colony optimizer (ACOR) has been successfully applied to various problems, there is room to boost its stability and improve convergence speed and precision. In addition, it is prone to stagnation, which means it cannot step out of the local optimum (LO). To effectively mitigate these concerns, an improved method using a random spare strategy and chaotic intensification strategy is proposed. Also, its selection mechanism is enhanced in our research. Among the new components, the convergence speed is mainly boosted by using a random spare approach. To effectively augment the ability to step out of LO and to refine the convergence accuracy, the chaotic intensification strategy and improved selection mechanism are applied to ACOR. To better verify the effectiveness of the proposed method, a series of comparative experiments are conducted by using 30 benchmark functions. According to all experimental results, it is evident that the convergence rapidity and accuracy of the proposed method is better than other peers. In addition, it is observed that the capability of enhanced RCACO is more reliable than other techniques in stepping out of LO. Furthermore, an excellent multi-threshold image segmentation method is proposed in this paper. On this basis, image segmentation experiments at low threshold levels and high threshold levels are also respectively carried out. The experimental results also adequately disclose that the segmentation results of RCACO for both multi-threshold image segmentation at a low threshold level and high threshold level, are even more satisfactory compared to other studied algorithms.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Image quality assessment: from error visibility to structural similarity
Wang, Z., Bovik, A. C., Sheikh, H. R., & Simoncelli, E. P. (2004) · IEEE Transactions on Image Processing · doi:10.1109/tip.2003.819861 · Cited by 57,892
Storn, R., & Price, K. (1997) · Journal of Global Optimization · doi:10.1023/a:1008202821328 · Cited by 29,569
Scope of validity of PSNR in image/video quality assessment
Huynh-Thu, Q., & Ghanbari, M. (2008) · Electronics Letters · doi:10.1049/el:20080522 · Cited by 2,959
Xie, J., Wen, D., Liang, L., Jia, Y., Gao, L., & Lei, J. (2018) · JMIR mHealth and uHealth · doi:10.2196/mhealth.9754 · Cited by 310
Cited by
Magnetic Nanoparticles in Targeted Drug Delivery: a Review
kianfar, E. (2021) · Journal of Superconductivity and Novel Magnetism · doi:10.1007/s10948-021-05932-9 · Cited by 280
A survey of image encryption algorithms based on chaotic system
Fang, P., Liu, H., Wu, C., & Liu, M. (2023) · The Visual Computer · doi:10.1007/s00371-022-02459-5 · Cited by 97
Metadata
- Authors
- Zhao, D., Liu, L., Yu, F., Heidari, A. A., Wang, M., Liang, G., Muhammad, K., & Chen, H.
- Venue
- Knowledge-Based Systems
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2021-03
- Volume
- 216
- Pages
- 106510
- ISSN
- 0950-7051 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W3094536368
- Cited by
- 307
- References
- 4
- FWCI
- 24.25
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Chaotic random spare ant colony optimization for multi-threshold image segmentation of 2D Kapur entropy. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.knosys.2020.106510
- The paper
- Zhao, D., Liu, L., Yu, F., Heidari, A. A., Wang, M., Liang, G., Muhammad, K., & Chen, H. (2021). Chaotic random spare ant colony optimization for multi-threshold image segmentation of 2D Kapur entropy. Knowledge-Based Systems. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.knosys.2020.106510
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.