The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Orthogonal learning covariance matrix for defects of grey wolf optimizer: Insights, balance, diversity, and feature selection
Abstract
Abstract This research’s genesis is in two aspects: first, a guaranteed solution for mitigating the grey wolf optimizer’s (GWO) defects and deficiencies. Second, we provide new open-minding insights and deep views about metaheuristic algorithms. The population-based GWO has been recognized as a popular option for realizing optimal solutions. Despite the popularity, the GWO has structural defects and uncertain performance and has certain limitations when dealing with complex problems such as multimodality and hybrid functions. This paper tries to overhaul the shortcomings of the original process and develops a GWO variant enhanced with a covariance matrix adaptation evolution strategy (CMAES), levy flight mechanism, and orthogonal learning (OL) strategy named GWOCMALOL. The algorithm uses the levy flight mechanism, orthogonal learning strategy, and CMAES to bring more effective exploratory inclinations. We conduct numerical experiments based on various functions in IEEE CEC2014. It is also compared with 10 other algorithms with competitive performances, 7 improved GWO variants, and 11 advanced algorithms. Moreover, for more systematic data analysis, Wilcoxon signed-rank test is used to evaluate the results further. Experimental results show that the GWOCMALOL algorithm is superior to other algorithms in terms of convergence speed and accuracy. The proposed GWO-based version is discretized into a binary tool through the transformation function. We evaluate the performance of the new feature selection method based on 24 UCI datasets. Experimental results show that the developed algorithm performs better than the original technique, and the defects are resolved. Besides, we could reach higher classification accuracy and fewer feature selections than other optimization algorithms.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Storn, R., & Price, K. (1997) · Journal of Global Optimization · doi:10.1023/a:1008202821328 · Cited by 29,569
No free lunch theorems for optimization
Wolpert, D. H., & Macready, W. G. (1997) · IEEE Transactions on Evolutionary Computation · doi:10.1109/4235.585893 · Cited by 14,237
Holland, J. H. (1992) · Scientific American · doi:10.1038/scientificamerican0792-66 · Cited by 5,764
Cited by
Magnetic Nanoparticles in Targeted Drug Delivery: a Review
kianfar, E. (2021) · Journal of Superconductivity and Novel Magnetism · doi:10.1007/s10948-021-05932-9 · Cited by 280
Metadata
- Authors
- Hu, J., Chen, H., Heidari, A. A., Wang, M., Zhang, X., Chen, Y., & Pan, Z.
- Venue
- Knowledge-Based Systems
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2021-02
- Volume
- 213
- Pages
- 106684
- ISSN
- 0950-7051 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W3112535140
- Cited by
- 289
- References
- 3
- FWCI
- 21.88
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Orthogonal learning covariance matrix for defects of grey wolf optimizer: Insights, balance, diversity, and feature selection. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.knosys.2020.106684
- The paper
- Hu, J., Chen, H., Heidari, A. A., Wang, M., Zhang, X., Chen, Y., & Pan, Z. (2021). Orthogonal learning covariance matrix for defects of grey wolf optimizer: Insights, balance, diversity, and feature selection. Knowledge-Based Systems. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.knosys.2020.106684
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.