Cited by 62Sentiment Analysis and Opinion MiningTopic ModelingHate Speech and Cyberbullying Detection

Gated recurrent unit with multilingual universal sentence encoder for Arabic aspect-based sentiment analysis

AL-Smadi, Mohammad, Hammad, Mahmoud M., Al-Zboon, Sa’ad A., AL-Tawalbeh, Saja, Cambria, Erik·2023·Knowledge-Based Systems

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.knosys.2021.107540

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
AL-Smadi, M., Hammad, M. M., Al-Zboon, S. A., AL-Tawalbeh, S., & Cambria, E.
Affiliations
  • Jordan University of Science and Technology (JO)
  • Nanyang Technological University (SG)
Corresponding author
AL-Smadi, Mohammad
Venue
Knowledge-Based Systems
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2023-02
Volume
261
Pages
107540
ISSN
0950-7051 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3206224646
Cited by
62
References
2
Citations by year
2026: 6 · 2025: 16 · 2024: 24 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 9
FWCI
3.54
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Knowledge-Based Systems (publishedVersion)
  • DR-NTU (Nanyang Technological University) (submittedVersion)
Funders
Jordan University of Science and Technology (20200145, 20190306)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Sentiment Analysis and Opinion Mining
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Topic Modeling
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Hate Speech and Cyberbullying Detection
Keywords
aspect-based sentiment analysis, gated recurrent unit, aspect extraction, hotel reviews

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review