Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 1,513

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Why landscapes of the past are important for the future

Antrop, Marc·2005·Landscape and Urban Planning
DOI 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2003.10.002
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2003.10.002

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

No references could be resolved yet.

Research works printed but not linked: 53

  1. Aalen, F.H.A., Whelan, K., Stout, M. (Eds.), 1997. Atlas of the Irish Rural Landscape. Cork University Press, Cork.
  2. Antrop, 2001, The language of landscape ecologists and planners. A comparative content analysis of concepts used in landscape ecology, Lands. Urban Plan, 55, 163, 10.1016/S0169-2046(01)00151-7 · DOI
  3. Antrop, 2000, Background concepts for integrated landscape analysis, Agric. Ecosyst. Environ, 77, 17, 10.1016/S0167-8809(99)00089-4 · DOI
  4. Antrop, M., 2000b. Where are the Genii Loci? In: Pedroli, B. (Ed.), Landscape—our Home, Lebensraum Landschaft. Essays on the Culture of the European Landscape as a Task. Indigo, Zeist, Freies Geistesleben, Stuttgart, pp. 29–34.
  5. Antrop, 2000, Changing patterns in the urbanized countryside of Western Europe, Lands. Ecol, 15, 257, 10.1023/A:1008151109252 · doi:10.1023/a:1008151109252
  6. Antrop, M., 1999. Transport routes in the landscape: about connectors, dividers, initiators, attractors and views. In: Kristensen, L., Petersen, E.H. (Eds.), Transport og Landskab. Landskabsøkologiske skrifter nr. 13, Center for Landskabsforskning, pp. 21–39.
  7. Antrop, 1997, The concept of traditional landscapes as a base for landscape evaluation and planning. The example of Flanders Region, Lands. Urban Plan, 38, 105, 10.1016/S0169-2046(97)00027-3 · DOI
  8. Austad, I., 2000. The future of traditional agriculture landscapes: retaining desirable qualities. In: Klijn, J., Vos, W. (Eds.), From Landscape Ecology to Landscape Science. Kluwer Academic Publishers, WLO, Wageningen, pp. 43–56.
  9. Brandt, 2002, General principles of monitoring land cover change based on two case studies in Britain and Denmark, Lands. Urban Plan, 62, 37, 10.1016/S0169-2046(02)00095-6 · doi:10.1016/s0169-2046(02)00095-6
  10. Brandt, J., Holmes, E., Skriver, P., 2001. Urbanisation of the countryside-problems of interdisciplinarity in the study of rural development. In: Conference on the Open SPACE Functions under URBAN Pressure. Ghent, 19–21 September.
  11. Butlin, R.A., 1992. De Mens en het platteland. In: Blockmans, W. (Ed.), De mens en het landschap. De wording van Europa. Hilversum, HD Communications Consultants and Weert, M&P, Uitgeverij, pp. 9–32.
  12. Carpenter, T.J., 1994. The Environmental Impact of Railways. Wiley, London.
  13. Champion, T., 2001. Urbanisation, suburbanisation, counterurbanisation and reurbanisation. In: Paddison, R. (Ed.), Handbook of Urban Studies. Sage Publications, London, pp. 143–161. · DOI · Paper page
  14. Cheshire, 1995, A new phase of urban development in Western Europe? The evidence for the 1980s, Urban Stud, 32, 1045, 10.1080/00420989550012564 · doi:10.1080/00420989550012564
  15. Coeterier, 2002, Lay people’s evaluation of historic sites, Lands. Urban Plan, 59, 125, 10.1016/S0169-2046(02)00007-5 · doi:10.1016/s0169-2046(02)00007-5
  16. Cosgrove, D., 1989. Geography is everywhere: culture and symbolism in human landscapes. In: Gregory, D., Walford, R. (Eds.), Horizons in Human Geography. Macmillan, Basingstoke, pp. 118–135. · DOI · Paper page
  17. Dramstad, 2001, Integrating landscape-based values—Norwegian monitoring of agricultural landscapes, Lands. Urban Plan, 57, 257, 10.1016/S0169-2046(01)00208-0 · DOI
  18. Forman, R.T.T., 1998. Road ecology: a solution for a giant embracing us. Lands. Ecol. 13, iii–v. · doi:10.1023/a:1008036602639
  19. Geyer, 1993, A theoretical foundation for the concept of differential urbanization, Int. Region. Sci. Rev, 15, 157, 10.1177/016001769301500202 · DOI · Paper page
  20. Green, B.H., 2000. Policy, planning and management initiatives in European cultural landscape conservation. In: Klijn, J., Vos, W. (Eds.), From Landscape Ecology to Landscape Science. Kluwer Academic Publishers, WLO, Wageningen, pp. 57–72.
  21. Holdaway, E., Smart, G., 2001. Landscapes at Risk? The Future for Areas of Outstanding Natural Beauty. SPON Press—Taylor & Francis Group, London.
  22. Holtorf, C.J., 1998. Monumental Past. The Life-histories of Megalithic Monuments in Mecklenburg-Vorpommern (Germany). CITD Press, Scarborough. Available: http://citd.scar.utoronto.ca/CITDPress/holtorf/0.1.html.
  23. Ihse, M., 1996. Monitoring cultural landscapes in Sweden—methods and data of landscape change. In: Jongman, R.H.G. (Ed.), Ecological and Landscape Consequences of Land Use Change in Europe. Proceedings of the First ECNC Seminar on Land Use Change and its Ecological Consequences, Tilburg. ECNC Publication Series on Man and Nature 2, Tilburg, pp. 103–129.
  24. Klijn, J., Vos, W., 2000. A new identity for landscape ecology in Europe: a research strategy for next decade. In: Klijn, J., Vos, W. (Eds.), From Landscape Ecology to Landscape Science. Kluwer Academic Publishers, WLO, Wageningen, pp. 149–161.
  25. Kolen, J., Lemaire, T. (Eds.), 1999. Landschap in Meervoud. Perspectieven op het Nederlandse Landschap in de 20ste/21ste eeuw. Uitg. J. van Arkel, Utrecht.
  26. Lewis, 1976, The urbanization of the countryside: a framework for analysis, Geografiska Annaler, 58, 17, 10.1080/04353684.1976.11879409 · doi:10.1080/04353684.1976.11879409
  27. Lowenthal, D., 1985. The Past is a Foreign Country. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
  28. Lowenthal, D., 1997. European landscape transformations: the rural residue. In: Groth, P., Bressi, T.W. (Eds.), Understanding Ordinary Landscapes. Yale University Press, New Haven, CT, pp. 180–188. · doi:10.12987/9780300185614-016
  29. Lucy, 1997, The post-suburban era comes to Richmond: city decline, suburban transition and exurban growth, Lands. Urban Plan, 36, 259, 10.1016/S0169-2046(96)00358-1 · doi:10.1016/s0169-2046(96)00358-1
  30. Lynch, K., 1973. What Time Is This Place? MIT Press, Cambridge, Massachusetts, London.
  31. Meeus, 1990, Agricultural landscapes in Europe and their transformation, Lands. Urban Plan, 18, 289, 10.1016/0169-2046(90)90016-U · DOI
  32. Meinig, D.W., 1979. The beholding eye. Ten versions of the same sense. In: Meinig, D.W. (Ed.), Interpretation of Ordinary Landscapes: Geographical Essays. Oxford University Press, Oxford.
  33. Muir, R., 2000. The NEW Reading the Landscape. Fieldwork in Landscape History. University of Exeter Press, Exeter.
  34. Muir, R., 1999. Approaches to Landscape. MacMillan, London. · DOI
  35. Nassauer, J.I., 1997. Placing Nature. Culture and Landscape Ecology. Island Press, Washington, DC.
  36. Nitz, H.J., 1992. The temporal and spatial pattern of field reorganisation in Europe (18th and 19th centuries). A comparative view. In: Verhoeve, A., Vervloet, J. (Eds.), The Transformation of the European Rural Landscape: Methodological Issues and Agrarian Change 1770–1914. Tijdschrift van de Belg.Ver. voor Aardrijkskundige Studies LXI (1), pp. 146–158.
  37. Nohl, 2001, Sustainable landscape use and aesthetic perception—preliminary reflections on future landscape aesthetics, Lands. Urban Plan, 54, 223, 10.1016/S0169-2046(01)00138-4 · DOI
  38. Olwig, K., 2002. Landscape, Nature and the Body Politic: from Britain’s Renaissance to America’s New World. University of Wisconsin Press, Madison.
  39. Pacione, M., 2001. Urban Geography: A Global Perspective. Routledge, London. · doi:10.4324/9780203454626
  40. Pedroli, B. (Ed.), 2000. Landscape—our Home. Lebensraum Landschaft. Essays on the Culture of the European Landscape as a Task. Indigo, Zeist–Freies Geistesleben, Stuttgart.
  41. Preece, R.A., 1991. Designs on the Landscape. Belhaven Press, London.
  42. Rombaut, E., 2001. Considerations about the urban fringe of an ecopolis. A plea for a Lobe-City. In: European Symposium Open Space Functions Under Urban Pressure. Ghent, 19–21 September 2001, Administratie Land-en Tuinbouw, Brussel.
  43. Sassen, S., 2000. The Global City. Princeton University Press, New York, London, Tokyo. · DOI · Paper page
  44. Sooväli, H., Palang, H., Külvik, M., 2003. The role of rural landscapes in shaping Estonian national identity. In: Unwin, T. (Ed.), European Landscapes: From Mountain to Sea. Proceedings of the Permanent European Conference for the Study of the Rural Landscape, London and Aberystwyth, pp. 114–121.
  45. Stanners, D., Bourdeau, Ph. (Eds.), 1995. Europe’s Environment. The Dobřı́š Assessment. European Environment Agency, EC DG XI and Phare, Copenhagen.
  46. Tuan, Y.-F., 1990. Topophilia: A Study of Environmental Perception, Attitudes, and Values. Columbia University Press, Columbia.
  47. United Nations Centre for Human Settlement (HABITAT), 1996. An Urbanizing World. Global Report on Human Settlements 1996. Oxford University Press, Oxford.
  48. Van Eetvelde, V., Antrop, M., 2001. Comparison of the landscape structure of traditional and new landscapes. Some European examples. In: Mander, Ü., Printsmann, A., Palang, H. (Eds.), Development of European Landscapes. Conference Proceedings IALE European Conference 2001, vol. 2. Publicationes Instituti Geographici Universitatis Tartuensis, Tartu, p. 275.
  49. Viles, 2001, How to use roads in the creation of greenways: case studies in three New Zealand landscapes, Lands. Urban Plan, 55, 15, 10.1016/S0169-2046(00)00144-4 · doi:10.1016/s0169-2046(00)00144-4
  50. Vos, W., Klijn, J., 2000. Trends in European landscape development: prospects for a sustainable future. In: Klijn, J., Vos, W. (Eds.), From Landscape Ecology to Landscape Science. Kluwer Academic Publishers, WLO, Wageningen, pp. 13–30.
  51. Wascher, D., Jongman, R. (Eds.), 2000. European Landscapes. Classification, Assessment and Conservation (Technical report, draft). European Environment Agency.
  52. Wrbka T., Szerencsits, E., Reiter, K., 1997. Classification of Austrian cultural landscapes—implications for nature conservation and sustainable development. In: Miklos, L. (Ed.), Sustainable Cultural Landscapes in the Danube-Carpathian Region. Proceedings of the Second International Conference on Culture and Environment. Banska Stiavnica, Slovakia. UNESCO-Chair for Ecological Awareness and Sustainable Development/European Centre for Nature Conservation, pp. 31–41.
  53. The Dornach Landscape Document, 2000. Get Connected To Your Place! Discussion Document of the International Conference The Culture of the European Landscape as a Task. Dornach, Switzerland.

Cited by

See all 1,513

Metadata

Authors
Antrop, M.
Venue
Landscape and Urban Planning
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2005-01
Volume
70
Issue
1-2
Pages
21-34
ISSN
0169-2046 (ISSN-L)
DOI
10.1016/j.landurbplan.2003.10.002
OpenAlex
W2016123151
Cited by
1,513
References
0
FWCI
305.38
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Licence
www.elsevier.com/tdm/userlicense/1.0/ (tdm)

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Why landscapes of the past are important for the future. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.landurbplan.2003.10.002
The paper
Antrop, M. (2005). Why landscapes of the past are important for the future. Landscape and Urban Planning. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landurbplan.2003.10.002

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.