The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Using a GIS-based network analysis to determine urban greenspace accessibility for different ethnic and religious groups
Open accessAbstract
Greenspace access in an English city was analysed using a network analysis in a geographical information system (GIS). Access for different religious and ethnic groups was compared with benchmark standards that form part of the UK government guidance on greenspace provision. Despite having nearly more than twice the recommended amount of accessible greenspace per capita, its distribution and pattern show considerable variation especially when spatially analysed with respect to ethnic and religious groups. Whilst the specific results are locally important (Indian, Hindu and Sikh groups were found to have limited access to greenspace in the city), the study shows how a GIS-based network analysis in conjunction with statistical analysis of socio-economic data can be used to analyse the equity of access to community goods and services. The results can be used to inform the local planning process and the GIS approach can be expanded into other local authority domains. The approach presented in this paper offers a generic method for quantifying the differences in the provision of community goods and services (e.g. educational, health, environmental, etc.) for a range of different societal groups (e.g. related to deprivation, disability, occupation, economic activity, household tenure and types, age and health).
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Rigolon, A., Browning, M., & Jennings, V. (2018) · Landscape and Urban Planning · doi:10.1016/j.landurbplan.2018.05.026 · Cited by 444
The role of neighbourhood greenspace in children’s spatial working memory
Flouri, E., Papachristou, E., & Midouhas, E. (2019) · British Journal of Educational Psychology · doi:10.1111/bjep.12243 · Cited by 80
Beere, P., & Kingham, S. (2017) · New Zealand Geographer · doi:10.1111/nzg.12155 · Cited by 43
Metadata
- Authors
- Comber, A., Brunsdon, C., & Green, E.
- Venue
- Landscape and Urban Planning
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2008-05
- Volume
- 86
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 103-114
- ISSN
- 0169-2046 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2049576884
- Cited by
- 590
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 6.69
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Using a GIS-based network analysis to determine urban greenspace accessibility for different ethnic and religious groups. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.landurbplan.2008.01.002
- The paper
- Comber, A., Brunsdon, C., & Green, E. (2008). Using a GIS-based network analysis to determine urban greenspace accessibility for different ethnic and religious groups. Landscape and Urban Planning. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landurbplan.2008.01.002
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.