Cited by 305Agricultural Economics and PolicyLand Use and Ecosystem ServicesRural development and sustainability

Farmland abandonment in Europe: Identification of drivers and indicators, and development of a composite indicator of risk

Open access
Terres, Jean-Michel, Scacchiafichi, Luigi Nisini, Wania, Annett, Ambar, Margarida, Anguiano, Emeric, Buckwell, Allan, Coppola, Adele, Gocht, Alexander +6 more·2015·Land Use Policy

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.landusepol.2015.06.009

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Horticulture farms (e.g., FS1, FS2) have smaller UAA and higher land productivity than extensive cereal farms (e.g., FS3).

    “In essence, horticulture farms (e.g., FS1, FS2) have smaller UAA [50] and higher land productivity than extensive cereal farms (e.g., FS3).”

    From Integrated Sustainability Assessment of Divergent Mediterranean Farming Systems: Cyprus as a Case Study (2020) · cites this paper as [50]

    The citation follows “smaller UAA,” so the relevant attribution is the farm-size comparison, not the later productivity claim. Section 4.1.7 (page unavailable) says horticulture farms are smaller than grazing-livestock farms, but does not establish that they are smaller than extensive cereal farms. (LLM, conf=0.84)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 52 · Cited by 305

Research works printed but not linked: 6

  1. Brouwer, F., Baldock, D., Godeschalk, F., Beaufoy, G., 1997. Marginalisation of agricultural land in Europe. In: Paper presented at the Conference on Livestock systems in European rural development, Nafpoli, Greece.
  2. Coppola, A., 2004. An economic perspective on land abandonment processes. In: Working paper presented at the AVEC Workshop on Effects of Land Abandonment and Global Change on Plant and Animal Communities, Anacapri, Italy.
  3. Deininger, K., 2003. Land Policies for Growth and Poverty Reduction. World Bank Policy Research Report. World Bank and Oxford University Press.
  4. Jones, R.J.A., Thomasson, A.J., 1993. Effects of soil-climate-system interactions on the sustainability of land use: a European perspective. In: Kimble, J.M. (Ed.), Utilization of Soil Survey Information for Sustainable Land Use. Proceedings of the Eighth International Soil Management Workshop. USDA Soil Conservation Service National Soil Survey, 39-52.
  5. Nordström Källström, H., 2008. Between comfort and solitude -the social conditions at Swedish farms. Acta Universitatis agriculturae Sueciae, vol. 2008:74, (in Swedish).
  6. Sys, C., Van Ranst, E., Debaveye, J., 1991. Land evaluation Part I: Principles in land evaluation and crop production calculations. Agricultural Publications N • 7, G.A.D.C., Brussels, Belgium, pp. 274.

Authors
Terres, J.-M., Scacchiafichi, L. N., Wania, A., Ambar, M., Anguiano, E., Buckwell, A., Coppola, A., Gocht, A., Källström, H. N., Pointereau, P., Strijker, D., Visek, L., Vranken, L., & Zobena, A.
Affiliations
  • European Commission (BE)
  • Directorate-General for Agriculture and Rural Development (BE)
  • Institute for European Environmental Policy (BE)
  • University of Naples Federico II (IT)
  • Johann Heinrich von Thünen-Institut (DE)
  • Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences (SE)
  • Solagro (FR)
  • University of Groningen (NL)
  • KU Leuven (BE)
  • University of Latvia (LV)
Corresponding author
Terres, Jean-Michel
Venue
Land Use Policy
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2015-12
Volume
49
Pages
20-34
ISSN
0264-8377 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1468692895
Cited by
305
References
52
Citations by year
2026: 24 · 2025: 28 · 2024: 33 · 2023: 40 · 2022: 33 · 2021: 41 · 2020: 25 · 2019: 28 · 2018: 26 · 2017: 14 · 2016: 13
FWCI
54.25
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Land Use Policy (publishedVersion)
  • University of Groningen research database (University of Groningen / Centre for Information Technology) (publishedVersion, other-oa)
  • CINECA IRIS Institutional Research Information System (University of Basilicata) (submittedVersion)
  • Lirias (KU Leuven) (submittedVersion)
  • Joint Research Centre (European Commission) (submittedVersion)
  • OpenAgrar (submittedVersion)
  • University of Groningen research database (University of Groningen / Centre for Information Technology) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
Funders
European Commission
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › General Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Agricultural Economics and Policy
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Global and Planetary Change › Land Use and Ecosystem Services
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › General Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Rural development and sustainability
Keywords
agricultural abandonment, farm viability, Common Agricultural Policy, EU member states, rural development, data heterogeneity, spatial resolution

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review