Cited by 126Land Use and Ecosystem ServicesAgricultural Economics and PolicySustainable Agricultural Systems Analysis

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 56 of the 56 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Agricultural practices, ecosystem services and sustainability in High Nature Value farmland: Unraveling the perceptions of farmers and nonfarmers

Open access

Bernués, Alberto, Tello-García, Elena, Rodríguez-Ortega, Tamara, Ripoll-Bosch, Raimon, Casasús, Isabel·2016·Land Use Policy

DOI 10.1016/j.landusepol.2016.08.033

Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.landusepol.2016.08.033

Cites

56 of 56 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

The text we found for this paper looks like another document, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The text we found for this paper looks like another document, so the self-check wasn’t run.

Untitled work
(1984) · Cited by 81,983
Case Study Research: Design and Methods
Chaiklin, H. (1991) · The Journal of Nervous and Mental Disease · doi:10.1097/00005053-199102000-00025 · Cited by 39,639
The qualitative content analysis process
Elo, S., & Kyngäs, H. (2008) · Journal of Advanced Nursing · doi:10.1111/j.1365-2648.2007.04569.x · Cited by 22,617
Social Research Methods
Taylor, K. M. G., Nettleton, S., & Harding, G. (2010) · Taylor & Francis eBooks · doi:10.4324/9780203381175_chapter_9 · Cited by 14,642
Five misunderstandings about case-study research
Flyvbjerg, B. (2006) · Qualitative Inquiry · doi:10.1177/1077800405284363 · Cited by 14,266
Ecosystems and Human Well-being: Synthesis
Assessment, M. E. (2005) · Island Press · doi:10.5281/zenodo.18167309 · Cited by 10,665
Social Research Methods
Watts, J. H., & Roberson, C. (2013) · Routledge eBooks · doi:10.1201/b16015-6 · Cited by 6,518
Untitled work
(1993) · Medical Entomology and Zoology · Cited by 6,226
Challenges in integrating the concept of ecosystem services and values in landscape planning, management and decision making
de Groot, R. S., Alkemade, R., Braat, L., Hein, L., & Willemen, L. (2009) · Ecological Complexity · doi:10.1016/j.ecocom.2009.10.006 · Cited by 3,706
Defining and classifying ecosystem services for decision making
Fisher, B., Turner, R. K., & Morling, P. (2008) · Ecological Economics · doi:10.1016/j.ecolecon.2008.09.014 · Cited by 3,390

Show all 56 references

Sorted by citations

Back to the future: rethinking socioecological systems underlying high nature value farmlands
Lomba, Â., Moreira, F., Klimek, S., Jongman, R. H. G., Sullivan, C. A., Moran, J., Poux, X., Honrado, J. P., Pinto‐Correia, T., Plieninger, T., et al. (2019) · Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment · doi:10.1002/fee.2116 · Cited by 124
Farmers’ understanding of climate change in Nepal Himalayas: important determinants and implications for developing adaptation strategies
Paudel, B., Zhang, Y., Yan, J., Rai, R., Li, L., Wu, X., Chapagain, P. S., & Khanal, N. R. (2019) · Climatic Change · doi:10.1007/s10584-019-02607-2 · Cited by 104
Farmers show complex and contrasting perceptions on ecosystem services and their management
Teixeira, H. M., Vermue, A. J., Cardoso, I. M., Peña‐Claros, M., & Bianchi, F. J. J. A. (2018) · Ecosystem Services · doi:10.1016/j.ecoser.2018.08.006 · Cited by 95
Using crop diversity to lower pesticide use: Socio-ecological approaches
Thomine, E., Mumford, J. D., Rusch, A., & Desneux, N. (2021) · The Science of The Total Environment · doi:10.1016/j.scitotenv.2021.150156 · Cited by 98
Farmers' perceptions of agricultural land use changes in Nepal and their major drivers
Paudel, B., Zhang, Y., Yan, J., Rai, R., & Li, L. (2019) · Journal of Environmental Management · doi:10.1016/j.jenvman.2019.01.091 · Cited by 82
Delineation of a basic farmland protection zone based on spatial connectivity and comprehensive quality evaluation: A case study of Changsha City, China
Chen, Y., Yao, M., Zhao, Q., Chen, Z., Jiang, P., Li, M., & Chen, D. (2020) · Land Use Policy · doi:10.1016/j.landusepol.2020.105145 · Cited by 78
Perceiving the invisible: Formal education affects the perception of ecosystem services provided by native areas
Lima, F. P., & Bastos, R. P. (2019) · Ecosystem Services · doi:10.1016/j.ecoser.2019.101029 · Cited by 64
Exploring social preferences for ecosystem services of multifunctional agriculture across policy scenarios
Bernués, A., Alfnes, F., Clemetsen, M., Eik, L. O., Faccioni, G., Ramanzin, M., Ripoll‐Bosch, R., Rodríguez-Ortega, T., & Sturaro, E. (2019) · Ecosystem Services · doi:10.1016/j.ecoser.2019.101002 · Cited by 60
Self-citation
A novel management-based system of payments for ecosystem services for targeted agri-environmental policy
Rodríguez-Ortega, T., Tolosana, A. O., & Bernués, A. (2018) · Ecosystem Services · doi:10.1016/j.ecoser.2018.09.007 · Cited by 59
Self-citation
Animal genetic resources diversity and ecosystem services
Leroy, G., Baumung, R., Boettcher, P. J., Besbes, B., From, T., & Hoffmann, I. (2018) · Global Food Security · doi:10.1016/j.gfs.2018.04.003 · Cited by 57
Assessing Ecosystem Services Supplied by Agroecosystems in Mediterranean Europe: A Literature Review
Balzan, M. V., Sadula, R., & Scalvenzi, L. (2020) · Land · doi:10.3390/land9080245 · Cited by 56
Ecosystem service value decreases more rapidly under the dual pressures of land use change and ecological vulnerability: A case study in Zhujiajian Island
Xie, Z., Li, X., Chi, Y., Jiang, D., Zhang, Y., Ma, Y., & Chen, S. (2020) · Ocean & Coastal Management · doi:10.1016/j.ocecoaman.2020.105493 · Cited by 55
Measuring Multifunctional Agricultural Landscapes
Song, B., Robinson, G. M., & Bardsley, D. K. (2020) · Land · doi:10.3390/land9080260 · Cited by 61
Structural equation model of young farmers' intention to adopt sustainable agriculture: a case study in Bangladesh
Sarkar, A., Wang, H., Rahman, A., Azim, J. A., Memon, W. H., & Lu, Q. (2021) · Renewable Agriculture and Food Systems · doi:10.1017/s1742170521000429 · Cited by 50
The legitimacy of result-oriented and action-oriented agri-environmental schemes: A comparison of farmers’ and citizens’ perceptions
Vainio, A., Tienhaara, A., Haltia, E., Hyvönen, T., Pyysiäinen, J., & Pouta, E. (2019) · Land Use Policy · doi:10.1016/j.landusepol.2019.104358 · Cited by 57
Do agroecological practices enhance the supply of ecosystem services? A comparison between agroecological and conventional horticultural farms
Palomo-Campesino, S., García‐Llorente, M., Hevia, V., Boeraeve, F., Dendoncker, N., & González, J. A. (2022) · Ecosystem Services · doi:10.1016/j.ecoser.2022.101474 · Cited by 46
Citizen perceptions and values associated with ecosystem services from European grassland landscapes
Tindale, S. J., Vicario‐Modroño, V., Gallardo‐Cobos, R., Hunter, E., Miškolci, S., Newell‐Price, P., Sánchez‐Zamora, P., Sonnevelt, M., Ojo, M., McInnes, K. J., et al. (2023) · Land Use Policy · doi:10.1016/j.landusepol.2023.106574 · Cited by 41
The value of transhumance for biodiversity conservation: Vulture foraging in relation to livestock movements
Aguilera-Alcalá, N., Arrondo, E., Pascual‐Rico, R., Morales‐Reyes, Z., Gil‐Sánchez, J. M., Donázar, J. A., Moleón, M., & Sánchez‐Zapata, J. A. (2021) · AMBIO · doi:10.1007/s13280-021-01668-x · Cited by 38
Demand and supply of agricultural ES: towards benefit-based policy
Tienhaara, A., Haltia, E., Pouta, E., Arovuori, K., Grammatikopoulou, I., Miettinen, A., Koikkalainen, K., Ahtiainen, H., & Artell, J. V. (2019) · European Review of Agricultural Economics · doi:10.1093/erae/jbz044 · Cited by 40
Understanding Farmers’ Perceptions and Behaviors towards Farmland Quality Change in Northeast China: A Structural Equation Modeling Approach
Liu, H., & Luo, X. (2018) · Sustainability · doi:10.3390/su10093345 · Cited by 35
The resilience of Finnish farms: Exploring the interplay between agency and structure
Kuhmonen, I. (2020) · Journal of Rural Studies · doi:10.1016/j.jrurstud.2020.10.012 · Cited by 34
Bridging the Gap Between Biofuels and Biodiversity Through Monetizing Environmental Services of Miscanthus Cultivation
von Cossel, M., Winkler, B., Mangold, A., Lask, J., Wagner, M., Lewandowski, I. M., Elbersen, B. S., van Eupen, M., Mantel, S., & Kiesel, A. (2020) · Earth s Future · doi:10.1029/2020ef001478 · Cited by 36
Assessing social-ecological connectivity of agricultural landscapes in Spain: Resilience implications amid agricultural intensification trends and urbanization
Zimmerer, K. S., Olivencia, Y. J., Rodríguez, L. P., Estébanez, N. L., Álvarez, F. A., Olmo, R. M., Ochoa, C. Y., Pulpón, Á. R. R., & García, Ó. J. (2022) · Agricultural Systems · doi:10.1016/j.agsy.2022.103525 · Cited by 34
Assessing and simulating changes in ecosystem service value based on land use/cover change in coastal cities: A case study of Shanghai, China
Xin, X., Zhang, T., He, F., Zhang, W., & Chen, K. (2023) · Ocean & Coastal Management · doi:10.1016/j.ocecoaman.2023.106591 · Cited by 34
Unravelling opportunities, synergies, and barriers for enhancing silvopastoralism in the Mediterranean
Varela, E., Tolosana, A. O., Blasco, I., Capdevila, C. C., Lecegui, A., Casasús, I., Bernués, A., & Collado, D. (2022) · Land Use Policy · doi:10.1016/j.landusepol.2022.106140 · Cited by 32
Self-citation
How to Optimize Ecosystem Services Based on a Bayesian Model: A Case Study of Jinghe River Basin
Tang, C., Li, J., Zhou, Z., Zeng, L., Zhang, C., & Hui, R. (2019) · Sustainability · doi:10.3390/su11154149 · Cited by 30
Characterizing agroecological and conventional farmers: uncovering their motivations, practices, and perspectives toward agriculture
Palomo-Campesino, S., García‐Llorente, M., & González, J. A. (2021) · Agroecology and Sustainable Food Systems · doi:10.1080/21683565.2021.1933671 · Cited by 29
Role of Local Action Groups in Improving the Sense of Belonging of Local Communities with Their Territories
Menconi, M. E., Artemi, S., Borghi, P., & Grohmann, D. (2018) · Sustainability · doi:10.3390/su10124681 · Cited by 28
Understanding landowners’ intention to restore native areas: The role of ecosystem services
Lima, F. P., & Bastos, R. P. (2020) · Ecosystem Services · doi:10.1016/j.ecoser.2020.101121 · Cited by 26
Targeting best agricultural practices to enhance ecosystem services in European mountains
Bernués, A., Tenza-Peral, A., Gómez‐Baggethun, E., Clemetsen, M., Eik, L. O., & Collado, D. (2022) · Journal of Environmental Management · doi:10.1016/j.jenvman.2022.115255 · Cited by 27
Self-citation
Heterogeneous public preferences for controlling agricultural non-point source pollution based on a choice experiment
Li, X., Cai, J., Wang, Q., & Wang, X. (2022) · Journal of Environmental Management · doi:10.1016/j.jenvman.2021.114413 · Cited by 25
Which pro-environmental farming behaviors should be priorities for funding? An approach based on matching ecosystem services (ESs) demand and supply
Song, M., Jin, G., & Yan, W. (2021) · Journal of Environmental Management · doi:10.1016/j.jenvman.2021.113368 · Cited by 24
Impacts of farmers' management styles on income and labour under alternative extensive land use scenarios
Morgan‐Davies, C., Wilson, R., & Waterhouse, A. (2017) · Agricultural Systems · doi:10.1016/j.agsy.2017.04.011 · Cited by 24
Are citizens willing to pay for the ecosystem services supported by Common Agricultural Policy? A non-market valuation by choice experiment
Blasi, E., Rossi, E. S., Zabala, J. A., Fosci, L., & Sorrentino, A. (2023) · The Science of The Total Environment · doi:10.1016/j.scitotenv.2023.164783 · Cited by 23
Towards Sustainable Management of Urban Ecological Space: A Zoning Approach Hybridized by Ecosystem Service Value and Ecological Risk Assessment
Wu, Y., Gu, C., & Zhang, Y. (2022) · Land · doi:10.3390/land11081220 · Cited by 22
Determining the ecological compensation standards based on willingness to accept (WTA) for intensive agricultural production areas: A case in China
Zhang, Z., Cui, Y., Wang, L., Sun, X., & Gao, Y. (2023) · Applied Geography · doi:10.1016/j.apgeog.2023.103051 · Cited by 23
Collective capabilities shape the co-production of nature’s contributions to people in the alpine agricultural system of the Maurienne valley, France
Grosinger, J., Vallet, A., Palomo, I., Buclet, N., & Lavorel, S. (2021) · Regional Environmental Change · doi:10.1007/s10113-021-01840-9 · Cited by 19
Dependence on the socio-economic system impairs the sustainability of pasture-based animal agriculture
Muñoz‐Ulecia, E., Bernués, A., Briones-Hidrovo, A., Casasús, I., & Collado, D. (2023) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/s41598-023-41524-4 · Cited by 18
Self-citation
How do farm and farmer attributes explain perceived resilience?
Benhamou, A. P., Bernués, A., Gaspar, P., Echániz, J. L., Mancilla-Leytón, J. M., Mandaluniz, N., Guerrero, Y. M., Soriano, B., Ondé, D., & Collado, D. (2024) · Agricultural Systems · doi:10.1016/j.agsy.2024.104016 · Cited by 18
Self-citation
Balancing irrigation multifunctionality based on key stakeholders’ attitudes: Lessons learned from the Muzza system, Italy
Ricart, S., & Gandolfi, C. (2017) · Land Use Policy · doi:10.1016/j.landusepol.2017.09.047 · Cited by 18
Carotenoids and tocopherol in plasma and subcutaneous fat colour to trace forage-feeding in growing steers
Blanco, M., Ripoll, G., Casasús, I., Bertolín, J. R., & Joy, M. (2018) · Livestock Science · doi:10.1016/j.livsci.2018.12.003 · Cited by 17
Self-citation
Combining LULC data and agricultural statistics for A better identification and mapping of High nature value farmland: A case study in the veneto Plain, Italy
Bonato, M., Cian, F., & Giupponi, C. (2019) · Land Use Policy · doi:10.1016/j.landusepol.2019.02.034 · Cited by 17
Nutritional Quality and Socio-Ecological Benefits of Mare Milk Produced under Grazing Management
Blanco‐Doval, A., Barrón, L. J. R., & Aldai, N. (2024) · Foods · doi:10.3390/foods13091412 · Cited by 16
Citizen support for agri-environmental measures motivated by environmental consciousness
Fockaert, L., Mathijs, E., & Vranken, L. (2022) · Landscape and Urban Planning · doi:10.1016/j.landurbplan.2022.104675 · Cited by 16
Public perception of ecosystem and social services produced by Sardinia extensive dairy sheep farming systems
Madau, F. A., Arru, B., Furesi, R., Sau, P., & Pulina, P. (2022) · Agricultural and Food Economics · doi:10.1186/s40100-022-00225-8 · Cited by 15
Drought and Agricultural Ecosystem Services in Developing Countries
Keshavarz, M., & Karami, E. (2018) · Sustainable agriculture reviews · doi:10.1007/978-3-319-90309-5_9 · Cited by 15
New Technique for Monitoring High Nature Value Farmland (HNVF) in Basilicata
Fiorentino, C., D’Antonio, P., Toscano, F., Donvito, A. R., & Modugno, F. (2023) · Sustainability · doi:10.3390/su15108377 · Cited by 14
Estimating the value of ecosystem services in agricultural landscapes amid intensification pressures: The Brazilian case
Parron, L. M., Villanueva, A. J., & Glenk, K. (2022) · Ecosystem Services · doi:10.1016/j.ecoser.2022.101476 · Cited by 14
Coastal wetland management in the Great Barrier Reef: Farmer perceptions
Oza, T. M., Lane, R., Adame, M. F., & Reef, R. (2021) · Geographical Research · doi:10.1111/1745-5871.12497 · Cited by 13
Public willingness to pay for farmland non‐point source pollution governance toward sustainable development: A choice experiment in Gansu, China
Shi, Y., Li, C., Zhao, M., & Qin, G. (2023) · Sustainable Development · doi:10.1002/sd.2799 · Cited by 15
Understanding roles and functions of cattle breeds for pastoralists in Benin
Tamou, C., de Boer, I. J. M., Ripoll‐Bosch, R., & Oosting, S. J. (2018) · Livestock Science · doi:10.1016/j.livsci.2018.02.013 · Cited by 14
Self-citation
Landowners’ Socio-Cultural Valuation of Ecosystem Services Provided by Trees in Costa Rican Agricultural Landscapes
Leary, J., Grimm, K. E., Aslan, C. E., Mark, M. M., Frey, S. J. K., & Bath-Rosenfeld, R. (2021) · Environmental Management · doi:10.1007/s00267-021-01442-5 · Cited by 13
Farmers perceive diminishing ecosystem services, but overlook dis-services in intensively used agricultural landscapes in the North China Plain
Cheng, J., Xu, Z., Liang, Z., Li, F., Cong, W., Zhang, C., Song, L., Wang, C., Zhang, F. S., Richter, A. P., et al. (2023) · Journal of Environmental Management · doi:10.1016/j.jenvman.2023.119060 · Cited by 13
Is meat quality of forage‐fed steers comparable to the meat quality of conventional beef from concentrate‐fed bulls?
Blanco, M., Casasús, I., Ripoll, G., Albertí, P., Panea, B., & Joy, M. (2017) · Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture · doi:10.1002/jsfa.8371 · Cited by 13
Self-citation
A review of high nature value farming systems in Europe: Biodiversity, ecosystem services, drivers, innovations and future prospects
Varela, E., Jay, M., Flinzberger, L., Mobarak, C., & Plieninger, T. (2025) · People and Nature · doi:10.1002/pan3.70048 · Cited by 12
Which Ecosystem Services Are Really Integrated into Local Culture? Farmers' Perceptions of the Columbian and Venezuelan Páramos
Leroy, D., & García, S. B. (2021) · Human Ecology · doi:10.1007/s10745-021-00251-y · Cited by 12
Spatial-Temporal Dynamic Evaluation of Ecosystem Service Value and Its Driving Mechanisms in China
Wei, X., Zhao, L., Cheng, P., Xie, M., & Wang, H. (2022) · Land · doi:10.3390/land11071000 · Cited by 12
Rendered Agroecosystem Services and Dysservices of Dairy Farming: A Bottom-Up Approach in Galicia (Spain)
González, I. V., Fra, M. P., Arias, A. I. G., Paços, B. V., & Iglesias, E. L. (2021) · Sustainability · doi:10.3390/su13158509 · Cited by 12
Understanding relations between pastoralism and its changing natural environment
Tamou, C. (2017) · doi:10.18174/411051 · Cited by 12
How Are Landscapes under Agroecological Transition Perceived and Appreciated? A Belgian Case Study
Boeraeve, F., Dufrêne, M., Dendoncker, N., Dupire, A., & Mahy, G. (2020) · Sustainability · doi:10.3390/su12062480 · Cited by 11
“Among the body of literature available regarding the perception of landscape changes [30–32], few studies include the concept of ES explicitly [33].”
BackgroundResultInfluential
A Framework of Payment for Ecosystem Services to Protect Cropland: A Case Study of the Yangtze River Delta in China
Guo, J., Zhu, T., Ou, M., Pei, F., Gan, X., Ou, W., & Tao, Y. (2018) · Sustainability · doi:10.3390/su10010178 · Cited by 12
Exploring Farmers’ Management Practices and Values of Ecosystem Services in an Agroecosystem Context—A Case Study from the Eastern Cape, South Africa
Choruma, D. J., & Odume, O. N. (2019) · Sustainability · doi:10.3390/su11236567 · Cited by 12
Environmental and socio-economic resources at the landscape level – Potentials for sustainable land use in the Georgian Greater Caucasus
Theissen, T., Aurbacher, J., Bedoshvili, D., Felix‐Henningsen, P., Hanauer, T., Hüller, S., Kalandadze, B., Leonhäuser, I., Magiera, A., Otte, A., et al. (2018) · Journal of Environmental Management · doi:10.1016/j.jenvman.2018.11.024 · Cited by 11
Dynamic Evolution and Spatial Convergence of the Virtual Cultivated Land Flow Intensity in China
Wang, K., Wu, W., Jabbar, A., Wolde, Z., & Ou, M. (2021) · International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health · doi:10.3390/ijerph18137164 · Cited by 10
People’s attitudes towards the agrifood system influence the value of ecosystem services of mountain agroecosystems
Muñoz‐Ulecia, E., Bernués, A., Ondé, D., Ramanzin, M., Soliño, M., Sturaro, E., & Collado, D. (2022) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0267799 · Cited by 10
Self-citation
Innovation Gaps and Barriers in Alternative Innovative Solutions for Sustainable High Nature Value Grasslands. Evidence from Romania
Jitea, I. M., Mihai, V. C., Arion, F., Mureșan, I. C., & Dumitraş, D. E. (2021) · Agriculture · doi:10.3390/agriculture11030235 · Cited by 10
The Price of Farmland as a Factor in the Sustainable Development of Czech Agriculture (A Case Study)
Seeman, T., Šrédl, K., Prášilová, M., & Svoboda, R. (2020) · Sustainability · doi:10.3390/su12145622 · Cited by 10
Co-production of ecosystem services through agricultural practices: perception of stakeholders supporting smallholders in the Brazilian Amazon
Resque, A. G. L., Piketty, M.-G., Coudel, É., Messad, S., & Page, C. L. (2021) · Cahiers Agricultures · doi:10.1051/cagri/2021006 · Cited by 9
Agroecosystem services: From general assessment to policy implications
Bermeo, M. M. S., Rudolf, M., & Olschewski, R. (2024) · People and Nature · doi:10.1002/pan3.10605 · Cited by 10
Local ecological knowledge and education drive farmers' contrasting perceptions of scavengers and their function in Nepal
Bhattacharjee, A., Sadadev, B. M., Karmacharya, D. K., Baral, R., Pérez‐García, J. M., Giménez, A., Sánchez‐Zapata, J. A., & Anadón, J. D. (2022) · People and Nature · doi:10.1002/pan3.10315 · Cited by 8
Are We Missing the Big Picture? Unlocking the Social-Ecological Resilience of High Nature Value Farmlands to Future Climate Change
Lomba, Â., Buchadas, A., Honrado, J. P., & Moreira, F. (2019) · Climate change management · doi:10.1007/978-3-319-75004-0_4 · Cited by 8
Working with or against multifunctional landscapes? A case study of land users’ local knowledge of grassland–forest transition zones in northeastern Germany
Schümann, H., Knierim, A., Bellingrath‐Kimura, S. D., & Kernecker, M. L. (2022) · Ecology and Society · doi:10.5751/es-12970-270138 · Cited by 7
Optimization and classification control of permanent basic farmland based on quality classification
Wang, W., Chen, Y., Liu, K., Dang, Y., Li, G., Wen, L., & Cao, Y. (2024) · Frontiers in Environmental Science · doi:10.3389/fenvs.2024.1331534 · Cited by 7
Ecological Compensation and Comprehensive Zoning of Cultivated Land Based on Ecosystem Service Value and Extended Three-Dimensional Ecological Footprint Model: A Case Study of Shandong Province
Jia, X., & Niu, J. (2025) · Land · doi:10.3390/land14020316 · Cited by 7
Spatial effects of the agricultural ecosystem services based on environmental kuznets curve in Mengyin county, China
Chen, Y., Yang, Y., Fang, L., Zhao, H., Yang, Z., Chen, L., & Yu, H. (2023) · Heliyon · doi:10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e15918 · Cited by 7
Deliberative-analytic approaches to Ecosystem Services as a way forward for the land sparing/sharing debate
Durrant, R., & Ely, A. (2022) · Land Use Policy · doi:10.1016/j.landusepol.2022.106061 · Cited by 7
Distribution modelling of the garden dormouse Eliomys quercinus (Linnaeus, 1766) with novel climate change indicators
BENNETT, D. B., & Richard, F. (2021) · Mammalian Biology · doi:10.1007/s42991-021-00118-1 · Cited by 6
A practical approach to assess the resilience attributes of livestock farms
Benhamou, A. P., Meuwissen, M. P. M., Slijper, T., Bernués, A., Gaspar, P., Echániz, J. L., Mancilla-Leytón, J. M., Mandaluniz, N., Guerrero, Y. M., Soriano, B., et al. (2025) · animal · doi:10.1016/j.animal.2025.101566 · Cited by 6
Self-citation
Study on the Evaluation and Assessment of Ecosystem Service Spatial Differentiation at Different Scales in Mountainous Areas around the Beijing–Tianjin–Hebei Region, China
Yang, H., Cao, J., & Hou, X. (2023) · International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health · doi:10.3390/ijerph20021639 · Cited by 8
Spatiotemporal Variation of Cultivated Land Security and Its Drivers: The Case of Yingtan City, China
Lihua, K., Ye, Y., Xi, G., Xie, W., & Xiaomin, Z. (2021) · Journal of Resources and Ecology · doi:10.5814/j.issn.1674-764x.2021.02.014 · Cited by 6
Evaluating the economic and land use consequences of sustainability-driven CAP reforms: Insights from an optimization approach in Italian cereal farms
Cappella, M. T., Nerozzi, L., Benini, M., Detti, P., & Blasi, E. (2025) · Land Use Policy · doi:10.1016/j.landusepol.2025.107720 · Cited by 5
Socioeconomic prerequisites determine national long-term biomonitoring efforts
Haubrock, P. J., Soto, I., Tarkan, A. S., Macêdo, R. L., Kouba, A., Cuthbert, R. N., Briski, E., Everts, T., & Kurtul, I. (2024) · Journal of Environmental Management · doi:10.1016/j.jenvman.2024.122431 · Cited by 5
Trends in High Nature Value Farmland and Ecosystem Services Valuation: A Bibliometric Review
Girão, I., Gomes, E., Pereira, P., & Rocha, J. (2023) · Land · doi:10.3390/land12101952 · Cited by 5
Integrating eco-compensation with both supply and demand of farmland ecosystem services for sustainable development: a resource-dependence perspective
Liu, B., Xu, L., Wei, Y., Long, Y., & Ao, C. (2025) · Environment Development and Sustainability · doi:10.1007/s10668-024-05945-z · Cited by 5
Public Willingness to Pay for Farmland Eco-Compensation and Allocation to Farmers: An Empirical Study from Northeast China
Liu, B., Xu, L., Long, Y., Wei, Y., & Ao, C. (2024) · Agriculture · doi:10.3390/agriculture14071166 · Cited by 4
Comparing the farmland preservation goals of the government and the public from insights of ecosystem services trade-offs: Evidence from Hubei, China
Song, M., Zhu, M., Wang, H., Ji, Y., & Li, T. (2024) · Habitat International · doi:10.1016/j.habitatint.2024.103014 · Cited by 4
No bats, no gain: educational intervention increases farmers perception of ecosystem services
Lima, F. P., & Bastos, R. P. (2021) · International Journal of Agricultural Sustainability · doi:10.1080/14735903.2021.1911510 · Cited by 4
“Non‐Grain Production” or “Grain‐Oriented Production”: Can Adjusting the Planting Structure Improve the Farmland Ecosystem Service Value?
Chen, R., Wang, Y., Yevu, M., Wang, Q., & Wang, Y. (2025) · Land Degradation and Development · doi:10.1002/ldr.70126 · Cited by 3
Quantifying Ecological Well-Being Loss under Rural–Urban Land Conversion: A Study from Choice Experiments in China
Han, M., & Song, M. (2020) · Sustainability · doi:10.3390/su12083378 · Cited by 3
Farming System Choice Is Key to Preserving Surface Water Quality in Agricultural Watersheds
Derossi, F. N., Ribeiro, P. F., & Santos, J. L. (2024) · Agronomy · doi:10.3390/agronomy14010214 · Cited by 3
Evaluación integral de la sostenibilidad de la producción ovina de carne en Aragón
Pardos, L., Crespo, B. L., Bernués, A., Alabart, J. L., & Fantova, E. (2022) · Informacion Tecnica Economica Agraria · doi:10.12706/itea.2022.003 · Cited by 2
Self-citation
Management on Transfer Pricing of Farmland Based on the Supply–Demand Mismatches for Multifunction: A Case Study from China
Wu, L., & Ren, G. (2024) · Land · doi:10.3390/land13091372 · Cited by 2
European Union Citizens’ Perception of the Reasons for the Cost of the Common Agricultural Policy
Mata, F., & Domingues, I. (2025) · European Countryside · doi:10.2478/euco-2025-0007 · Cited by 2
Sustaining biodiversity and ecosystem services with agricultural production
Tenza-Peral, A., Ripoll‐Bosch, R., Casasús, I., Collado, D., & Bernués, A. (2023) · Elsevier eBooks · doi:10.1016/b978-0-323-90885-6.00013-2 · Cited by 4
Self-citation
Connotation analysis, feature identification, and classification control of High Nature Value cultivated land: Take Chengdu Plain Economic Zone as an example
Shi, S. H. I., Jin, X., Shi-lei, W. A. N. G., Jing-ping, L. I. U., Su-chen, Y. I. N. G., & Zhou, Y. (2023) · 自然资源学报 · doi:10.31497/zrzyxb.20231111 · Cited by 2
A systematic review of European farmer and non-farmer attitudes towards landscapes, ecosystem services, and agricultural management practices: Implications for permanent grassland managementPreprint
Tindale, S. J., Elliott, J. E., Elings, M., Gallardo‐Cobos, R., Hunter, E., Lieberherr, E., Miškolci, S., Newell‐Price, P., Quatrini, S., Sánchez‐Zamora, P., et al. (2020) · bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) · doi:10.1101/2020.06.12.148585 · Cited by 2
Sustentabilidad ambiental rural y servicios ecosistémicos: una revisión
Muelas, D. A. S., & Vargas, J. E. B. (2023) · Luna Azul · doi:10.17151/luaz.2023.56.3 · Cited by 1
The role of trust in wildlife damage response systems: One step towards coexistence between livestock farming and large carnivores?
Marsden, K., Jay, M., Blaschka, A., Langöen, K., Mertzanis, Y., Hovardas, T., Salvatori, V., Schwarz, L., Singer, L., & Wietlisbach, X. (2026) · People and Nature · doi:10.1002/pan3.70239 · Cited by 1
The provisioning of ecosystem services in the dehesa from the farmers’ perspective: a DPSIR assessment to promote nature-based solutions
López-Domínguez, F., Sánchez‐Zamora, P., Vicario‐Modroño, V., & Gallardo‐Cobos, R. (2026) · Agroforestry Systems · doi:10.1007/s10457-026-01504-9 · Cited by 1
Ecological Values, Green Attitudes, and Norms: VBN Pathways to Farmers' Adoption of Sustainable Practices ( SDGs 12, 13, 15)
Khan, F., Abbass, K., & Qun, W. (2026) · Sustainable Development · doi:10.1002/sd.71231 · Cited by 1

Authors: Bernués, A., Tello-García, E., Rodríguez-Ortega, T., Ripoll-Bosch, R., & Casasús, I.
Affiliations: Universidad de Zaragoza (ES)
Corresponding author: Bernués, Alberto
ORCID: Bernués, Alberto
Tello-García, Elena
Rodríguez-Ortega, Tamara
Ripoll-Bosch, Raimon
Casasús, Isabel
Venue: Land Use Policy
Publisher: Elsevier BV
Published: 2016-12
Volume: 59
Pages: 130-142
ISSN: 0264-8377 (ISSN-L)
DOI: 10.1016/j.landusepol.2016.08.033
OpenAlex: W2511617271
Cited by: 126
References: 56
Citations by year: 2026: 15 · 2025: 12 · 2024: 11 · 2023: 16 · 2022: 15 · 2021: 18 · 2020: 13 · 2019: 12 · 2018: 10 · 2017: 4
FWCI: 6.43
Type: journal article
Language: en
Open access: green
research.wur.nl
Licence: www.elsevier.com/tdm/userlicense/1.0/ (tdm)
Locations: Land Use Policy (publishedVersion)
Socio-Environmental Systems Modeling (acceptedVersion)
Data Archiving and Networked Services (DANS) (submittedVersion)
Funders: Marie Curie FP7-PEOPLE-2011 IEF (299794)
European Commission
Topics: Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Global and Planetary Change › Land Use and Ecosystem Services
Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › General Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Agricultural Economics and Policy
Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Agronomy and Crop Science › Sustainable Agricultural Systems Analysis
Keywords: high nature value farmland, ecosystem services, agricultural practices, farmer perceptions, economic sustainability, social sustainability, grazing management, cultural ecosystem services, food quality, agri-environmental policy

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

Agricultural practices, ecosystem services and sustainability in High Nature Value farmland: Unraveling the perceptions of farmers and nonfarmers

Overview

Integrity signals

Verification

Claims the paper makes

Self-check

Citations

Cites

Cited by

Related

Metadata

Record

About these checks