The DOI matches its Crossref record; 47 of the 47 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Agriculture 4.0: Making it work for people, production, and the planet
Open accessAbstract
Abstract Three tenets of sustainable intensification should guide the fourth agricultural revolution: people, production, and the planet. Thus far, narratives of agriculture 4.0 have been predominately framed in terms of benefits to productivity and the environment with little attention placed on social sustainability. This is despite the fact that agriculture 4.0 has significant social implications, both potentially positive and negative. Our viewpoint highlights the need to incorporate social sustainability (or simply ‘people’) into technological trajectories and we outline a framework of multi-actor co-innovation to guide responsible socio-technical transitions. Through the greater inclusion of people in agricultural innovation systems guided by responsible innovation principles, we can increase the likelihood of this technology revolution achieving social sustainability alongside benefiting production and the environment.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Sen, A. (2009) · Rugman Reviews · doi:10.1007/978-1-137-28787-8_94 · Cited by 15,837
Clapp, J., & Sen, A. (1999) · International Journal · doi:10.2307/40203469 · Cited by 13,411
The online disinhibition effect
Suler, J. (2004) · CyberPsychology & Behavior · doi:10.1089/1094931041291295 · Cited by 4,375
Developing a framework for responsible innovation
Stilgoe, J., Owen, R., & Macnaghten, P. (2013) · Research Policy · doi:10.1016/j.respol.2013.05.008 · Cited by 3,184
Who's in and why? A typology of stakeholder analysis methods for natural resource management
Reed, M. S., Graves, A., Dandy, N., Posthumus, H., Hubacek, K., Morris, J., Prell, C., Quinn, C. H., & Stringer, L. C. (2009) · Journal of Environmental Management · doi:10.1016/j.jenvman.2009.01.001 · Cited by 2,659
(2019) · Cited by 2,637
Shandler, R. (2019) · Journal of Cyber Policy · doi:10.1080/23738871.2019.1637914 · Cited by 2,092
Three frames for innovation policy: R&D, systems of innovation and transformative change
Schot, J., & Steinmueller, W. E. (2018) · Research Policy · doi:10.1016/j.respol.2018.08.011 · Cited by 1,801
Sustainable Intensification in Agriculture: Premises and Policies
Garnett, T., Appleby, M. C., Balmford, A., Bateman, I. J., Benton, T. G., Bloomer, P., Burlingame, B., Dawkins, M., Dolan, L., Fraser, D., et al. (2013) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1234485 · Cited by 1,741
Reconciling Food Production and Biodiversity Conservation: Land Sharing and Land Sparing Compared
Phalan, B., Onial, M., Balmford, A., & Green, R. E. (2011) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1208742 · Cited by 1,686
Cited by
Enhancing smart farming through the applications of Agriculture 4.0 technologies
Javaid, M., Haleem, A., Singh, R. P., & Suman, R. (2022) · International Journal of Intelligent Networks · doi:10.1016/j.ijin.2022.09.004 · Cited by 573
Lajoie-O'Malley, A., Bronson, K., van der Burg, S., & Klerkx, L. (2020) · Ecosystem Services · doi:10.1016/j.ecoser.2020.101183 · Cited by 390
Patterns of Inequalities in Digital Agriculture: A Systematic Literature Review
Hackfort, S. (2021) · Sustainability · doi:10.3390/su132212345 · Cited by 186
Alexander, C. S., Yarborough, M., & Smith, A. (2024) · Precision Agriculture · doi:10.1007/s11119-023-10063-3 · Cited by 84
Metadata
- Authors
- Rose, D. C., Wheeler, R., Winter, M., Lobley, M., & Chivers, C.-A.
- Venue
- Land Use Policy
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2021-01
- Volume
- 100
- Pages
- 104933
- ISSN
- 0264-8377 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W3044606553
- Cited by
- 346
- References
- 47
- FWCI
- 23.68
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Agriculture 4.0: Making it work for people, production, and the planet. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.landusepol.2020.104933
- The paper
- Rose, D. C., Wheeler, R., Winter, M., Lobley, M., & Chivers, C.-A. (2021). Agriculture 4.0: Making it work for people, production, and the planet. Land Use Policy. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2020.104933
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
