CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 520Public Policy and Administration ResearchPublic Administration and Political AnalysisCommunity Health and Development

Integrative leadership and the creation and maintenance of cross-sector collaborations

Crosby, Barbara C., Bryson, John M.·2010·The Leadership Quarterly
DOI 10.1016/j.leaqua.2010.01.003
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.leaqua.2010.01.003

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

No citation lists for this paper

No citation lists for this paper yet — checked again daily.

References 113 · Cited by 520

Authors
Crosby, B. C., & Bryson, J. M.
Affiliations
University of Minnesota (US)
Corresponding author
Crosby, Barbara C.
ORCID
Venue
The Leadership Quarterly
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2010-04
Volume
21
Issue
2
Pages
211-230
ISSN
1048-9843 (ISSN-L)
DOI
10.1016/j.leaqua.2010.01.003
OpenAlex
W2030495495
Cited by
520
References
113
Citations by year
2026: 25 · 2025: 33 · 2024: 44 · 2023: 42 · 2022: 48 · 2021: 42 · 2020: 68 · 2019: 34 · 2018: 25 · 2017: 23 · 2016: 34 · 2015: 34 · 2014: 21 · 2013: 21 · 2012: 15
FWCI
47.78
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Licence
Locations
The Leadership Quarterly (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Public Administration › Public Policy and Administration Research
  • Social Sciences › Political Science and International Relations › Public Administration and Political Analysis
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Community Health and Development
Keywords
integrative leadership, intersectoral collaboration, public value, common good, public problem solving, geographic information systems, leadership roles

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review