Building bridges from the margins: The work of leadership in social change organizations
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Boundary-spanning represents a distinctive contribution of women's leadership in complex institutional environments.
“As Ospina and Foldy (2010) argue, such boundary-spanning represents a distinctive contribution of women's leadership in complex institutional environments.”
From Transcending Boundaries: Sushma Swaraj and the Multidimensional Paradigm of Women's Empowerment in Political Leadership (2025) · cites this paper as Ospina and Foldy (2010)
No citation lists for this paper
No citation lists for this paper yet — checked again daily.
References 84 · Cited by 306
- Authors
- Ospina, S., & Foldy, E.
- Affiliations
- New York University (US)
- Corresponding author
- Ospina, Sonia
- Venue
- The Leadership Quarterly
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2010-04
- Volume
- 21
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 292-307
- ISSN
- 1048-9843 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2072742013
- Cited by
- 306
- References
- 84
- Citations by year
- 2026: 23 · 2025: 26 · 2024: 31 · 2023: 21 · 2022: 16 · 2021: 23 · 2020: 22 · 2019: 15 · 2018: 36 · 2017: 11 · 2016: 13 · 2015: 18 · 2014: 17 · 2013: 10 · 2012: 14
- FWCI
- 18.82
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- The Leadership Quarterly (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Community Health and Development
- Social Sciences › Public Administration › Public Policy and Administration Research
- Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Strategy and Management › Leadership and Management in Organizations
- Keywords
- relational leadership, social change organizations, collaborative governance, organizational collaboration, leadership practices, interdependence, collective action, marginalized communities, boundary spanning, constructionism, narrative analysis
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
