Cited by 405Ethics in Business and EducationLeadership and Management in OrganizationsWorkplace Spirituality and Leadership

Re-thinking ethical leadership: An interdisciplinary integrative approach

Eisenbeiss, Silke Astrid·2012·The Leadership Quarterly

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.leaqua.2012.03.001

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 102 · Cited by 405

Authors
Eisenbeiss, S. A.
Affiliations
Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München (DE)
Corresponding author
Eisenbeiss, Silke Astrid
Venue
The Leadership Quarterly
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2012-10
Volume
23
Issue
5
Pages
791-808
ISSN
1048-9843 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1984560652
Cited by
405
References
102
Citations by year
2026: 28 · 2025: 36 · 2024: 31 · 2023: 41 · 2022: 40 · 2021: 28 · 2020: 32 · 2019: 31 · 2018: 28 · 2017: 32 · 2016: 28 · 2015: 15 · 2014: 21 · 2013: 14
FWCI
32.66
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
The Leadership Quarterly (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Information Systems and Management › Ethics in Business and Education
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Strategy and Management › Leadership and Management in Organizations
  • Social Sciences › Demography › Workplace Spirituality and Leadership
Keywords
ethical leadership, normative ethics, world religions, ethical orientation, humane orientation, justice orientation, leadership practices, cross-cultural leadership, integrated approach

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review