Leader cognition: Approaches and findings
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Cognitive understanding of the possible effects of team diversity helps leaders recognize cues needed to predict whether the diverse team is more likely to show intergroup bias or information elaboration.
“We argue that cognitive understanding of the possible effects of team diversity in teams helps leaders to recognize the cues in the team and environment needed to predict whether the diverse team is more likely to show intergroup bias or information elaboration (Hooijberg et al., 1997;Mumford, Watts, & Partlow, 2015).”
From Leading diversity: Towards a theory of functional leadership in diverse teams. (2020) · cites this paper as Mumford, Watts, & Partlow, 2015
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Leading diversity: Towards a theory of functional leadership in diverse teams.
Homan, A. C., Gündemir, S., Buengeler, C., & van Kleef, G. A. (2020) · Journal of Applied Psychology · doi:10.1037/apl0000482 · Cited by 180 · see citing works
- Authors
- Mumford, M. D., Watts, L. L., & Partlow, P. J.
- Affiliations
- University of Oklahoma (US)
- Corresponding author
- Mumford, Michael D.
- ORCID
- Watts, Logan L.
- Venue
- The Leadership Quarterly
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2015-06
- Volume
- 26
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 301-306
- ISSN
- 1048-9843 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2073551838
- Cited by
- 41
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 7 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 2
- FWCI
- 4.37
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- The Leadership Quarterly (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Team Dynamics and Performance
- Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Strategy and Management › Leadership and Management in Organizations
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Ego Development and Educational Practices
- Keywords
- cognitive skills, leadership emergence, leader performance, leader development, leadership behavior
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
