Cited by 82Visual and Cognitive Learning ProcessesInnovative Teaching and Learning MethodsMathematics Education and Pedagogy

Relations between the worked example and generation effects on immediate and delayed tests

Open access
Chen, Ouhao, Kalyuga, Slava, Sweller, John·2016·Learning and Instruction

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.learninstruc.2016.06.007

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 82 · Cited by 82

Authors
Chen, O., Kalyuga, S., & Sweller, J.
Affiliations
  • Southern Cross University (AU)
  • UNSW Sydney (AU)
Corresponding author
Sweller, John
Venue
Learning and Instruction
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2016-10
Volume
45
Pages
20-30
ISSN
0959-4752 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2470089310
Cited by
82
References
82
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 13 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 8 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 11 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 16 · 2018: 8 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 2 · 2013: 1
FWCI
13.76
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Learning and Instruction (publishedVersion)
  • Cross Connect (Southern Cross University) (submittedVersion)
  • Figshare (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
Funders
China Scholarship Council (201308110473)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Visual and Cognitive Learning Processes
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Innovative Teaching and Learning Methods
  • Physical Sciences › Mathematics › Applied Mathematics › Mathematics Education and Pedagogy
Keywords
worked example effect, generation effect, instructional guidance, element interactivity, expertise, delayed recall, immediate recall, trigonometry learning, high school mathematics

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review