Girls get smart, boys get smug: Historical changes in gender differences in math, literacy, and academic social comparison and achievement
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Socio-economic background and gender are believed to affect student achievement.
“We also included socio-economic background and gender as contextual variables since these characteristics are believed to affect student achievement (e.g., Bodovski, Jeon, & Byun, 2017;Pfeffer, 2008;Parker et al., 2018).”
From Do those who talk more learn more? The relationship between student classroom talk and student achievement (2019) · cites this paper as Parker et al., 2018
Cites
Wang, M.-T., & Degol, J. (2013) · Developmental Review · doi:10.1016/j.dr.2013.08.001 · Cited by 837 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Sedova, K., Sedlacek, M., Svaricek, R., Majcik, M., Navratilova, J., Drexlerova, A., Kychler, J., & Salamounova, Z. (2019) · Learning and Instruction · doi:10.1016/j.learninstruc.2019.101217 · Cited by 146 · see citing works
- Authors
- Parker, P. D., Van Zanden, B., & Parker, R. B.
- Affiliations
- Australian Catholic University (AU)
- University of Wollongong (AU)
- Corresponding author
- Parker, Philip D.
- Venue
- Learning and Instruction
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2018-04
- Volume
- 54
- Pages
- 125-137
- ISSN
- 0959-4752 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2757155778
- Cited by
- 73
- References
- 1
- Citations by year
- 2026: 5 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 8 · 2023: 11 · 2022: 9 · 2021: 8 · 2020: 11 · 2019: 8 · 2018: 6
- FWCI
- 8.91
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Learning and Instruction (publishedVersion)
- Research Bank (Australian Catholic University) (submittedVersion)
- Research Online (University of Wollongong) (submittedVersion)
- Funders
- Australian Research Council (DE140100080, DP130102713)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Education, Achievement, and Giftedness
- Social Sciences › Safety Research › Career Development and Diversity
- Social Sciences › Gender Studies › Gender and Technology in Education
- Keywords
- gender differences in academic achievement, mathematics achievement, literacy achievement, academic self-concept, assimilation theory, contrast theory, rational choice theory, age cohorts, self-efficacy
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
