HT22 hippocampal neuronal cell line possesses functional cholinergic properties
Abstract
Aims Hippocampal cholinergic hypofunction is known to be involved in the cognitive deficits of Alzheimer's disease, but the detailed mechanisms remain to be elucidated. In order to establish an in vitro hippocampal cholinergic neuronal model for the relevant mechanistic studies, we have characterized a widely used hippocampal neuronal cell line, HT22, a sub-line derived from parent HT4 cells that were originally immortalized from primary mouse hippocampal neuronal culture. Main methods Western blot and immunocytochemistry were used to examine expression of cholinergic markers in HT22 cells. High potassium-evoked [(3)H]ACh release was used to evaluate the cholinergic functional properties of the cells. Key findings We found that HT22 cells express essential cholinergic markers, such as the high affinity choline transporter, choline acetyltransferase, vesicular acetylcholine transporter, and muscarinic acetylcholine receptors. Exposure of HT22 cells to high potassium evoked [(3)H]ACh release in a dose-dependent manner. In addition, the [(3)H]ACh release was significantly potentiated when presynaptic autoreceptors were blocked. Significance Our results suggest that HT22 cells possess functional cholinergic properties, and can be used for an in vitro model for defining the mechanisms in cognitive deficits of Alzheimer's disease.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Undifferentiated HT22 cells express low levels of cholinergic markers and glutamate receptors, in contrast to mature hippocampal neurons.
“Undifferentiated HT22 cells express low levels of cholinergic markers and glutamate receptors [25,26], in contrast to mature hippocampal neurons.”
From Shared and distinct microRNA profiles between HT22, N2A and SH-SY5Y cell lines and primary mouse hippocampal neurons (2025) · cites this paper as [25]
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Ruan, Y., Xiong, Y., Fang, W., Yu, Q., Mai, Y., Cao, Z., Wang, K., Lei, M., Xu, J., Liu, Y., et al. (2022) · Journal of Nanobiotechnology · doi:10.1186/s12951-022-01524-4 · Cited by 85 · see citing works
“HT22 cells culture is based on previously described method [28].”
MethodSelf-citationMurphy, R., Villegas-Salmerón, J., Sanz-Rodriguez, A., Engel, T., Mooney, C., Henshall, D. C., & Jimenez-Mateos, E. M. (2025) · PLOS One · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0326401 · Cited by 3 · see citing works
- Authors
- Liu, J., Li, L., & Suo, W. Z.
- Venue
- Life Sciences
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2009-02
- Volume
- 84
- Issue
- 9-10
- Pages
- 267-271
- ISSN
- 0024-3205
- Cited by
- 201
- References
- 0
- Language
- en
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review