Critical role of intraneuronal Aβ in Alzheimer's disease: Technical challenges in studying intracellular Aβ
Open accessAbstract
Aims Multiple lines of evidence have implicated β-amyloid (Aβ) in the pathogenesis of Alzheimer's disease (AD). However, the mechanism(s) whereby Aβ is involved in the disease process remains unclear. The dominant hypothesis in AD has been that Aβ initiates the disease via toxicity from secreted, extracellular Aβ aggregates. More recently, an alternative hypothesis has emerged focusing on a pool of Aβ that accumulates early on within AD vulnerable neurons of the brain. Although the topic of intraneuronal Aβ has been of major interest in the field, technical difficulties in detecting intraneuronal Aβ have also made this topic remarkably controversial. Here we review evidence pointing to the critical role of intraneuronal Aβ in AD and provide insights both into challenges faced in detecting intracellular Aβ and the prion-like properties of Aβ.Main methods Immunoprecipitation and Western blot are used for Aβ detection.Key findings We highlight that a standard biochemical method can underestimate intraneuronal Aβ and that extracellular Aβ can up-regulate intracellular Aβ. We also show that detergent can remove intraneuronal Aβ.Significance There is a growing awareness that intraneuronal Aβ is a key pathogenic pool of Aβ involved in causing synapse dysfunction. Difficulties in detecting intraneuronal Aβ are an insufficient reason for ignoring this critical pool of Aβ.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Aβ42 plays a central early role in the pathophysiology of AD that ultimately leads to neuron loss and dementia.
“These results, among others, strongly suggest that Aβ42 plays a central early role in the pathophysiology of AD that ultimately leads to the neuron loss and dementia observed in the disorder.”
From Neuron loss in the 5XFAD mouse model of Alzheimer’s disease correlates with intraneuronal Aβ42 accumulation and Caspase-3 activation (2013) · cites this paper as [5]
The Introduction (page unavailable) reports early Aβ accumulation in AD-vulnerable neurons, predominantly Aβ42/43. The Discussion (page unavailable) links intraneuronal Aβ to neuronal death and cognitive impairment in transgenic mice, but does not establish that Aβ42 ultimately causes neuron loss and dementia in people with AD; it says the pathogenic mechanism remains unresolved. (LLM, conf=0.80)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 52 · Cited by 39
Research works printed but not linked: 5
- Capetillo-Zarate E Gracia L Yu F Banfelder JR Lin MT Tampellini D Gouras GK 2011 Am J Pathol PMC3204026 21925470
- D'Andrea MR Nagele RG Wang HY Peterson PA Lee DH 2001 Histopathology 38 2 120 34 11207825
- Echeverria V Ducatenzeiler A Dowd E Janne J Grant SM Szyf M Wandosell F Avila J Grimm H Dunnett SB Hartmann T Alhonen L Cuello AC 2004 Neuroscience 129 3 583 92 15541880
- Grundke-Iqbal I Iqbal K George L Tung YC Kim KS Wisniewski HM 1989 Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 86 8 2853 7 2649895 PMC287017
- Wild-Bode C Yamazaki T Capell A Leimer U Steiner H Ihara Y Haass C 1997 J Biol Chem 272 26 16085 8 9195901
- Authors
- Gouras, G. K., Willén, K., & Tampellini, D.
- Affiliations
- Lund University (SE)
- Corresponding author
- Gouras, Gunnar K.
- Tampellini, Davide
- Venue
- Life Sciences
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2012-12
- Volume
- 91
- Issue
- 23-24
- Pages
- 1153-1158
- ISSN
- 0024-3205 (ISSN-L)
- PMC
- PMC3479332
- OpenAlex
- W2046830760
- Cited by
- 39
- References
- 52
- Citations by year
- 2025: 1 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 2 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 9 · 2014: 6 · 2013: 7
- FWCI
- 4.72
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
- Locations
- Life Sciences (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (acceptedVersion)
- PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
- Lund University Publications (Lund University) (submittedVersion)
- Funders
- MultiPark
- Swedish Research Council
- NIH (R01 AG027140)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Alzheimer's disease research and treatments
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Neurology › Neuroinflammation and Neurodegeneration Mechanisms
- Keywords
- intraneuronal amyloid-beta, Alzheimer's disease, amyloid-beta detection, detergent extraction, synaptic dysfunction
- MeSH terms
- Alzheimer Disease, Animals, Humans, Neurons, Saponins, Trypsin, Blotting, Western, Amyloid beta-Peptides, Amyloid beta-Protein Precursor, Octoxynol, Cell Line, Tumor, Immunoprecipitation, Intracellular Signaling Peptides and Proteins, Mice
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review