Cited by 57Neurotransmitter Receptor Influence on BehaviorOpioid Use Disorder TreatmentMemory and Neural Mechanisms

Effects of endurance, resistance, and concurrent exercise on learning and memory after morphine withdrawal in rats

Zarrinkalam, Ebrahim, Heidarianpour, Ali, Salehi, Iraj, Ranjbar, Kamal, Komaki, Alireza·2016·Life Sciences

Abstract

Aims Continuous morphine consumption contributes to the development of cognitive disorders. This work investigates the impacts of different types of exercise on learning and memory in morphine-dependent rats.Main methods Forty morphine-dependent rats were randomly divided into five groups: sedentary-dependent (Sed-D), endurance exercise-dependent (En-D), strength exercise-dependent (St-D), and combined (concurrent) exercise-dependent (Co-D). Healthy rats were used as controls (Con). After 10weeks of regular exercise (endurance, strength, and concurrent; each five days per week), spatial and aversive learning and memory were assessed using the Morris water maze and shuttle box tests.Key findings The results showed that morphine addiction contributes to deficits in spatial learning and memory. Furthermore, each form of exercise training restored spatial learning and memory performance in morphine-dependent rats to levels similar to those of healthy controls. Aversive learning and memory during the acquisition phase were not affected by morphine addiction or exercise, but were significantly decreased by morphine dependence. Only concurrent training returned the time spent in the dark compartment in the shuttle box test to control levels.Significance These findings show that different types of exercise exert similar effects on spatial learning and memory, but show distinct effects on aversive learning and memory. Further, morphine dependence-induced deficits in cognitive function were blocked by exercise. Therefore, different exercise regimens may represent practical treatment methods for cognitive and behavioral impairments associated with morphine-related disease.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.lfs.2016.05.034

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 52 · Cited by 57

Authors
Zarrinkalam, E., Heidarianpour, A., Salehi, I., Ranjbar, K., & Komaki, A.
Affiliations
  • Bu-Ali Sina University (IR)
  • Hamedan University of Medical Sciences (IR)
  • Islamic Azad University of Hamedan (IR)
Corresponding author
Heidarianpour, Ali
Venue
Life Sciences
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2016-07
Volume
157
Pages
19-24
ISSN
0024-3205 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2408509894
Cited by
57
References
52
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 8 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 13 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 6 · 2016: 1
FWCI
2.45
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Life Sciences (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
Hamadan University of Medical Sciences
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neurotransmitter Receptor Influence on Behavior
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Opioid Use Disorder Treatment
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Memory and Neural Mechanisms
Keywords
morphine withdrawal, morphine dependence, physical activity, endurance exercise, resistance training, concurrent exercise, spatial learning and memory, aversive learning, cognitive impairment, addiction
MeSH terms
Animals, Learning, Male, Memory, Morphine, Physical Conditioning, Animal, Substance Withdrawal Syndrome, Rats, Wistar, Maze Learning, Rats

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review