Effects of endurance, resistance, and concurrent exercise on learning and memory after morphine withdrawal in rats
Abstract
Aims Continuous morphine consumption contributes to the development of cognitive disorders. This work investigates the impacts of different types of exercise on learning and memory in morphine-dependent rats.Main methods Forty morphine-dependent rats were randomly divided into five groups: sedentary-dependent (Sed-D), endurance exercise-dependent (En-D), strength exercise-dependent (St-D), and combined (concurrent) exercise-dependent (Co-D). Healthy rats were used as controls (Con). After 10weeks of regular exercise (endurance, strength, and concurrent; each five days per week), spatial and aversive learning and memory were assessed using the Morris water maze and shuttle box tests.Key findings The results showed that morphine addiction contributes to deficits in spatial learning and memory. Furthermore, each form of exercise training restored spatial learning and memory performance in morphine-dependent rats to levels similar to those of healthy controls. Aversive learning and memory during the acquisition phase were not affected by morphine addiction or exercise, but were significantly decreased by morphine dependence. Only concurrent training returned the time spent in the dark compartment in the shuttle box test to control levels.Significance These findings show that different types of exercise exert similar effects on spatial learning and memory, but show distinct effects on aversive learning and memory. Further, morphine dependence-induced deficits in cognitive function were blocked by exercise. Therefore, different exercise regimens may represent practical treatment methods for cognitive and behavioral impairments associated with morphine-related disease.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Six weeks of HIIT exercise (6 sessions per week) caused a significant increase in SOD antioxidant enzyme and Total Antioxidant Capacity in the cerebellum but not in the cerebral cortex.
“The other survey reported that six weeks of HIIT exercise (6 sessions per week) caused a signi cant increase in Super Oxide Dismutase antioxidant enzyme and Total Antioxidant Capacity in the cerebellum but not in the cerebral cortex.”
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 52 · Cited by 57
- Authors
- Zarrinkalam, E., Heidarianpour, A., Salehi, I., Ranjbar, K., & Komaki, A.
- Affiliations
- Bu-Ali Sina University (IR)
- Hamedan University of Medical Sciences (IR)
- Islamic Azad University of Hamedan (IR)
- Corresponding author
- Heidarianpour, Ali
- Venue
- Life Sciences
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2016-07
- Volume
- 157
- Pages
- 19-24
- ISSN
- 0024-3205 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2408509894
- Cited by
- 57
- References
- 52
- Citations by year
- 2026: 2 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 8 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 13 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 6 · 2016: 1
- FWCI
- 2.45
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Life Sciences (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- Hamadan University of Medical Sciences
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neurotransmitter Receptor Influence on Behavior
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Opioid Use Disorder Treatment
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Memory and Neural Mechanisms
- Keywords
- morphine withdrawal, morphine dependence, physical activity, endurance exercise, resistance training, concurrent exercise, spatial learning and memory, aversive learning, cognitive impairment, addiction
- MeSH terms
- Animals, Learning, Male, Memory, Morphine, Physical Conditioning, Animal, Substance Withdrawal Syndrome, Rats, Wistar, Maze Learning, Rats
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review