A novel nanoproliposomes of lercanidipine: Development, in vitro and preclinical studies to support its effectiveness in hypertension therapy
Abstract
Aim The aim of the present study was to develop nanoproliposomes of lercanidipine, in order to overcome its poor biopharmaceutical properties and to improve its therapeutic efficacy in treating hypertension.Main methods The nanoproliposomes were prepared using a modified thin-film hydration method, and the formula was optimized by varying the ratio of lipids and the types of cryoprotectants. This optimized formulation was characterized in terms of its particle size, solid-state, drug release, in-situ absorption, in-vivo pharmacokinetics, and in-vivo anti-hypertensive activity in DOCA-salt induced hypertensive rats. Finally, a PK-PD correlation was established in order to understand the clinical implications of the developed novel nanoproliposomes.Key findings The nanoproliposomes showed a particle size of 174.7nm and an entrapment efficiency of 85.4%. The in-vitro release displayed initial rapid release (19.33%) followed by a sustained release profile, releasing 88.37% of the encapsulated drug. The in-situ studies showed a significant increase in absorption rate across the rat intestinal membrane. The pharmacokinetics of this novel form indicated a 2.75-fold increase in the absolute bioavailability as compared to pure lercanidipine. In addition, the nanoproliposomes were found to be efficient in treating hypertension in DOCA-salt induced hypertensive rats. The PK-PD correlation demonstrated no time lag between effect and exposure, indicating that a direct PK-PD relationship can be expected in the clinic.Significance These findings suggest that nanoproliposomes are promising carriers in improving the oral bioavailability and bioactivity of lercanidipine, and can be an effective therapy in the management of hypertension.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Liposomal encapsulation of lercanidipine improved drug absorption and bioavailability and reduced BP.
“Similarly, liposomal encapsulation of lercanidipine resulted in significantly improved drug absorption and bioavailability and eventually marked reduction in BP.147”
From Targeted therapy in chronic diseases using nanomaterial-based drug delivery vehicles (2019) · cites this paper as [147]
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 57 · Cited by 22
- Authors
- Deshpande, P. B., Gurram, A. K., Deshpande, A., Shavi, G. V., Musmade, P., Arumugam, K., Averineni, R. K., Mutalik, S., Reddy, M. S., & Udupa, N.
- Affiliations
- Manipal Academy of Higher Education (IN)
- Waterford Institute of Technology (IE)
- Corresponding author
- Deshpande, Praful Balavant
- Venue
- Life Sciences
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2016-10
- Volume
- 162
- Pages
- 125-137
- ISSN
- 0024-3205 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2518073098
- Cited by
- 22
- References
- 57
- Citations by year
- 2026: 2 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 3 · 2017: 2
- FWCI
- 0.68
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Life Sciences (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- Department of Science and Technology (SR/NM/NS-47/2008)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Materials Science › Biomaterials › Nanoparticle-Based Drug Delivery
- Life Sciences › Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics › Pharmaceutical Science › Drug Solubulity and Delivery Systems
- Life Sciences › Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics › Pharmaceutical Science › Advanced Drug Delivery Systems
- Keywords
- lercanidipine, hypertension, sustained drug release, oral bioavailability, pharmacokinetics, thin-film hydration, encapsulation efficiency, intestinal absorption, calcium channel blockers, drug carriers
- MeSH terms
- Animals, Antihypertensive Agents, Calorimetry, Differential Scanning, Dihydropyridines, Hypertension, Liposomes, Rabbits, X-Ray Diffraction, Rats, Wistar, Rats, Nanoparticles, In Vitro Techniques
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review