Drug repurposing and relabeling for cancer therapy: Emerging benzimidazole antihelminthics with potent anticancer effects
Abstract
Origin of drug and radio-refractory clones, cancer stem-like cells, and rapid angiogenesis and metastasis are among the primary concerns that limit the efficacy of anticancer treatments, emphasizing the urgency of developing new therapeutics. Factors like high attrition rates, huge investments, patients' heterogeneity, and diverse molecular subtypes have challenged the rapid development of anticancer drugs. Treatment with repurposing pleiotropic benzimidazole antihelminthics, like mebendazole, albendazole, and flubendazole has recently opened a new window, owing to their easy access, low cost as a generic drug, and long track record of safe use in the human population. This review highlights the outcomes of preclinical and clinical studies of these drugs as a potent anticancer agent(s) conducted in the last two decades. Substantial preclinical studies, as well as limited clinical trials, suggest noteworthy anticancer potency of these pleiotropic benzimidazoles, particularly as potent microtubule disrupting, anti-angiogenic, and anti-metastatic agents, inhibitors of the immune checkpoint, hypoxia-inducible factor, epithelial-mesenchymal transition, cancer stemness, and multidrug resistance protein 1, and inducers of apoptosis and M1 polarization. These anticancer effects are attributed to multiple action points, including intrinsic apoptosis, canonical Wnt/β-catenin, JAK/STAT-3, JNK, MEK/ERK, and hedgehog signaling pathways. The effective anticancer properties of mebendazole, albendazole, and flubendazole either alone or synergistically with frontline drugs, warrant their validation through controlled clinical trials to use them as promising avenues to anticancer therapy.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Mebendazole suppresses tumor growth in various cancer cell lines and animal models through inhibition of microtubule polymerization.
“MBZ has been shown to potentially suppress tumor growth in various cancer cell lines and animal models through the inhibition of microtubule polymerization”
From Drug repurposing for cancer therapy (2024) · cites this paper as [159]
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 164 · Cited by 71
- Authors
- Nath, J., Paul, R., Ghosh, S. K., Paul, J., Singha, B., & Debnath, N.
- Affiliations
- Cachar College (IN)
- Pandit Deendayal Upadhyaya Adarsha Mahavidyalaya (IN)
- University of Kalyani (IN)
- Jawaharlal Nehru University (IN)
- Gurucharan University, Silchar (IN)
- Corresponding author
- Nath, Joyobrato
- Venue
- Life Sciences
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2020-10
- Volume
- 378
- Pages
- 118189
- ISSN
- 0024-3205 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W3048229484
- Cited by
- 71
- References
- 164
- Citations by year
- 2026: 4 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 10 · 2023: 15 · 2022: 15 · 2021: 19 · 2020: 1
- FWCI
- 0.96
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Licence
- Locations
- Life Sciences (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Chemistry › Organic Chemistry › Synthesis and biological activity
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Cancer therapeutics and mechanisms
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › Cancer Cells and Metastasis
- Keywords
- drug repurposing, mebendazole, albendazole, flubendazole, anticancer activity, microtubule disruption, angiogenesis inhibition, antimetastatic activity, cancer stem-like cells, multidrug resistance protein 1, apoptosis, M1 macrophage polarization, Wnt/β-catenin signaling, MEK/ERK signaling, Hedgehog signaling, immune checkpoint blockade, hypoxia-inducible factor, epithelial-mesenchymal transition
- MeSH terms
- Animals, Anthelmintics, Antineoplastic Agents, Benzimidazoles, Clinical Trials as Topic, Humans, Neoplasms, Drug Repositioning
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review