The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Personality of elite male and female chess players and its relation to chess skill
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In chess, expertise is not inherently age-dependent.
“By focusing on chess, where expertise is not inherently age-dependent (Vollstädt-Klein et al., 2010), this approach isolates the effects of domain knowledge from broader demographic confounds and offers a more precise lens to investigate how true expertise shapes trust in and reliance on AI-driven systems.”
From Investigating appropriate reliance on AI-Based decision support systems: the role of expertise, trust, and self-confidence (2025) · cites this paper as Vollstädt-Klein et al., 2010
Citations
Cites
No references could be resolved yet.
Research works printed but not linked: 21
- Avni, 1987, Personality and leisure activities: An illustration with chess players, Personality and Individual Differences, 8, 715, 10.1016/0191-8869(87)90070-5 · DOI
- Bilalić, 2007, Does chess need intelligence — A study with young chess players, Intelligence, 35, 457, 10.1016/j.intell.2006.09.005 · DOI
- Bilalić, 2007, Personality profiles of young chess players, Personality and Individual Differences, 42, 901, 10.1016/j.paid.2006.08.025 · DOI
- Bilalić,, 2009, Why are (the best) women so good at chess? Participation rates and gender differences in intellectual domains, Proceedings of the Royal Society B, 276, 1161, 10.1098/rspb.2008.1576 · DOI
- Borkenau, 1989, Untersuchungen zum Fünf-Faktoren-Modell der Persönlichkeit und seiner diagnostischen Erfassung, Zeitschrift für Differentielle und Diagnostische Psychologie, 10, 239
- Clayton, 1994, Premorbid personality traits of men who develop unipolar or bipolar disorders, European Archives of Psychiatry and Clinical Neuroscience, 243, 340, 10.1007/BF02195728 · DOI
- Chabris, 2006, Sex differences in intellectual performance: Analysis of a large cohort of competitive chess players, Psychological Science, 17, 1040, 10.1111/j.1467-9280.2006.01828.x · DOI
- Deinzer, 1994, Situational effects in trait assessment: The FPI, NEOFFI and EPI questionnaires, European Journal of Personality, 9, 1, 10.1002/per.2410090102 · DOI
- Grabner, 2007, Individual differences in chess expertise: A psychometric investigation, Acta Psychologica, 124, 398, 10.1016/j.actpsy.2006.07.008 · DOI
- Grant, 2007, Personality and the occupational stressor–strain relationship: The role of the Big Five, Journal of Occupational Health Psychology, 12, 20, 10.1037/1076-8998.12.1.20 · DOI
- Hehl, 1985, The location of sense of humor within comprehensive personality spaces: An exploratory study, Personality and Individual Differences, 6, 703, 10.1016/0191-8869(85)90081-9 · DOI
- Kelly, 1985, The personality of chessplayers, Journal of Personality Assessment, 49, 282, 10.1207/s15327752jpa4903_13 · DOI
- Matsumoto, 2007, Culture, context, and behavior, Journal of Personality, 75, 1285, 10.1111/j.1467-6494.2007.00476.x · DOI
- Merikangas, 1993, Headache and personality: Results of a community sample of young adults: Migraine: The interface between neurology and psychiatry, Journal of Psychiatric Research, 27, 187, 10.1016/0022-3956(93)90007-O · DOI
- Newell, 1963, Chess-playing programs and the problem of complexity, IBM Journal of Research and Development, 2, 320, 10.1147/rd.24.0320 · DOI
- Ostendorf, 1997, Freiburger Persönlichkeitsinventar – Rev. Fassung (FPI-R), Zeitschrift für Differentielle und Diagnostische Psychologie, 18, 81
- Simon, 1973, Skill in chess, American Scientist, 61, 394
- Stevens, 1984, Chess champs: Introverts at play, Psychology Today, 18, 72
- Stieglitz, 2002, Das Freiburger Persönlichkeitsinventar(FPI). Test-Rezension, Zeitschrift für Klinische Psychologie und Psychotherapie, 31, 223, 10.1026//1616-3443.31.3.223 · DOI
- Thomas, 1988, Personality profiles of adolescent hypertensives, Personality and Individual Differences, 9, 297, 10.1016/0191-8869(88)90091-8 · DOI
- Wood, 2006, Cross-sectional and longitudinal tests of the personality and role identity structural model (prism), Journal of Personality, 74, 779, 10.1111/j.1467-6494.2006.00392.x · DOI
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Dogru, E. Ö., & Krämer, N. C. (2025) · Journal of Decision Systems · doi:10.1080/12460125.2025.2593251 · Cited by 15
“By focusing on chess, where expertise is not inherently age-dependent (Vollstädt-Klein et al., 2010), this approach isolates the effects of domain knowledge from broader demographic confounds and offers a more precise lens to investigate how true expertise shapes trust in and reliance on AI-driven…”
Metadata
- Authors
- Vollstädt-Klein, S., Grimm, O., Kirsch, P., & Bilalić, M.
- Affiliations
- Heidelberg University (DE)
- ORCID
- Kirsch, Peter
- Venue
- Learning and Individual Differences
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2010-10
- Volume
- 20
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 517-521
- ISSN
- 1041-6080 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2134977307
- Cited by
- 25
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 1 · 2016: 1 · 2013: 1 · 2012: 1
- FWCI
- 1.41
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Learning and Individual Differences (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Personality Traits and Psychology
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Sport Psychology and Performance
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Cognitive Abilities and Testing
- Keywords
- chess players, personality, elite athletes, gender differences, achievement motivation, introversion, life satisfaction, physical complaints
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review