Cited by 143Doctoral Education Challenges and SolutionsEducation, Achievement, and GiftednessMotivation and Self-Concept in Sports

Motivation for PhD studies: Scale development and validation

Litalien, David, Guay, Frédéric, Morin, Alexandre J.S.·2015·Learning and Individual Differences

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.lindif.2015.05.006

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • There is a general perception that a doctorate is a path to a successful career, making doctorate degrees highly attractive to students.

    “There is a general perception that a doctorate is a path to a successful career (e.g., higher income, more employment options, better working conditions, increased professional mobility), making doctorate degrees highly attractive to students (Litalien, Guay, and Morin, 2015).”

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 84 · Cited by 143

Authors
Litalien, D., Guay, F., & Morin, A. J. S.
Affiliations
  • Australian Catholic University (AU)
  • Université Laval (CA)
Corresponding author
Litalien, David
Venue
Learning and Individual Differences
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2015-07
Volume
41
Pages
1-13
ISSN
1041-6080 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W365709488
Cited by
143
References
84
Citations by year
2026: 12 · 2025: 8 · 2024: 18 · 2023: 10 · 2022: 10 · 2021: 18 · 2020: 13 · 2019: 14 · 2018: 18 · 2017: 18 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 1
FWCI
24.38
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Learning and Individual Differences (publishedVersion)
  • Corpus Université Laval (Université Laval) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of canada (SSHRC)
  • Canada Research Chair on Motivation and Academic Success
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Doctoral Education Challenges and Solutions
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Education, Achievement, and Giftedness
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Motivation and Self-Concept in Sports
Keywords
doctoral attrition, self-determination theory, motivational regulation, intrinsic motivation, integrated regulation, identified regulation, introjected regulation, external regulation, scale development, measurement invariance, PhD completion

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review